Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br /> A.A.Hall, J. Ogden Markel, Dele H. Heinly
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Vacation of certain
<br />alleys south of Delhi
<br />Road and east of Main St.
<br />Reso. 59-2 declaring
<br />intention to vacate
<br />
<br />Preliminary Record
<br />of Survey Map
<br />Edward Hall
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No. 776
<br />Quentin L. Richard -
<br />Request of Harold T.
<br />Odmark
<br />
<br />Pr~lim~ary Record of
<br />Survey Map -
<br />Steve Locken
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1057
<br />Richard Esparza
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing on the vacation of certain unnamed alleys south
<br />of Delhi Road and east of Main Street; no protests were received and the hearing
<br />was declared closed. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Hall and
<br />carried, that all proceedings heretofore enacted for the vacation of certain alleysi!
<br />in the area south of Delhi Road and east of Main Street, be terminated. The
<br />Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of
<br />Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following P~solution entitle~:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 59-2 approving map, declaring intention to vacate
<br /> certain ,mnamed alleys south of Delhi Road and east of Main Street,
<br /> reserving utility easements in certain of said alleys, and fixing
<br /> time and place of hearing thereon"
<br />
<br />as February 16, 1959, was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br /> A.A.Hall, Jo Ogden Markel, Dale H. Heinly
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilm~n Hubbard, seconded by Markel and carried, Preliminary Record:i
<br />of Survey Nap filed by Edward Fall dividing into two parcels, property located
<br />generally between Cedar Street on the west, Standard Avenue on the east and approx-i!
<br />~mately 400 feet north of St. Andrew Place,Was approved subject to the conditions
<br />of the Planning Department and condition No. 2 shall read "135 feet" instead of
<br />"120 feet", and condition No. 6 shall read "prior to the issuance of a building .'
<br />
<br />Co~mmnicationwas read from the Planning Commission advising that under date of
<br />
<br />June 18, 1956, Variance Application No. 776 filed by Quentin L. Richard, w~s granted
<br />on property situated at the southwest corner of Flower and Edinger Streets, to
<br />permit the establishment of a major service station at the northeast corner$ con-
<br />struct a building to the west of the service station, to be located 110 feet from
<br />center line of Edinger Street, and construct a building (maxLmum size 242 feet x
<br />
<br />100 feet) to the immediate south of service station, for a modern shopping center,
<br />subject to conditions. Mr. Harold T. 0dmark stated he purchased the property sub-
<br />Ject to the validity of the Variance and if the Record of Survey is enforced. It
<br />was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, that the deviation
<br />under Variance Application No. 776 be granted to move the entire structure slightly~i
<br />to the east, decreasing the size of the structure.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Markel and carried, ghe suggestion of'the
<br />Planning Department to delete condition No. 5, if the property at the southwest'
<br />corner of Flower and Edinger Streets is developed, as ~l~owed by VarianCe APPlication
<br />No. 776, requiring an alley as a condition of approval of the Preliminary Record
<br />of Survey Map filed by Steve Locken, was approved.
<br />
<br />0n motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendation
<br />of the Planning Commission was approved and Variance Application No. 1057 of Richard
<br />and Inez Esparza granted to re~uce the front yard from the required 60 feet to 55
<br />feet, instead of from 60 feet to 58 feet, as requested, on property situated at hfl
<br />South Daisy Street, in R-1 District, in order to permit construction of a one-story,
<br />twe-bedroc~ stucco house of 925 square feet on front part of the lot and maintain
<br />
<br />the required 15 feet between dwellings.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|