|
128
<br />
<br />Reso. No. 59-58
<br />Accept deed of
<br />Charles Smith
<br />
<br />Reso. No. 59-59
<br />Objecting to sale
<br />of four parcels of
<br />tax deeded property
<br />
<br />/
<br /> Reso. No. 59-60
<br />?~Correct and amend
<br /> Reso. No. 59-14
<br /> "west Santa Ana Annex"
<br /> Election - Mar. lC, 1959
<br />
<br />Petition
<br />Climax Mfg. Co.
<br />et al - Improvements
<br />on Pine Street
<br />
<br />or 17th Street to Westminster Avenue, but that they would look more favorably upon
<br />
<br />the ch~-nge of McClay Street and Grand Avenue to Glassell Street, and Memory T~,. to
<br />
<br />Garden Grove Boulevard. It was moved by Counci!maD Hubbard, seconded by Nall and
<br />
<br />carried, that the matter be continued until April 6, 1959.
<br />
<br />The Council having ,,nanimously waived the reading of the ResolUtion, on motion of
<br />Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the follow~ Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 59-58 accepting the deed of Charles Smith, where
<br /> the City is giving cash consideration"
<br />
<br />in the sum of $975.00 for property at 1053 West Sixth Street, for Civic 0enter site,
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Aye s, Councilmen
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, A. A. Hall, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br />None
<br />J. Ogden Markel, Dale N. Heinly
<br />
<br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of
<br />
<br />Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 59-59 of the City of Samta Aha objecting to the
<br />sale of four parcels of tax deeded property"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Council m-~n
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, A. A. g~l~, Stanley C. GoUld, Jr.,
<br />None
<br />J. Ogden Markel, Dale N. Heinly
<br />
<br />The Council having l~n-nfm~usly waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of
<br />
<br />Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 59-60 correcting and amending 'Resolution No. 59-14
<br />ca~l~a SpeCial ~e,~t~ipal Election to be held on the 10th day of
<br />March, 1959, to submit to the electors in that certain territory
<br />designated 'West Santa Aha Annex' the question of whether or not
<br />said 'territory should be annexed to the City of Santa Aha, California,
<br />declaring that protest had not been made by the owners of one-half
<br />of the value of said territory, ch-~ing the boundaries of said terri-
<br />tory .to delete therefrc~ that territory within Garden Grove Annexation
<br />No. 63, and resubmitting the boundaries as changed to the Orange
<br />County Boundary Cnmmission', to correctly state the intent, decision
<br />and action of the City Council taken on January 8th, 1959, in the
<br />adoption of said Resolution No. 59-14"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Cou~c ~ 1 men
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, A. A. Wall, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br />None
<br />J. Ogden Mmrkel, Dale H. Reinly
<br />
<br />A petition was presented signed by Clfm-x Manufacturing Company, 1025 East Chestnut
<br />
<br />Street, et al, requesting curbs, pavement, driveway entrances, grading appurtenances
<br />
<br />and appurtenant work where necessary to meet City standards on Pine Street from the
<br />center line of Minnie Street to the east line of Lot 10 Block D of Bailey's Addition,
<br />
<br />extended southerly to the cen~er line of the railroad tracks and thence mmning
<br />along said center line of the railroad to the south line of Pine Street. On motion
<br />of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the petition was referred to
<br />
<br />the Ma~sger for report and reco~endation~ on the findings.
<br />
<br />Conmmnications
<br />County of Orange,
<br />Boundary Commission et al
<br />
<br />0n motion of Counci]mmn Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the following communi-
<br />
<br />cations were received and filed:
<br />
<br /> From the County of Orange submitting copy of Resolution of the Board of
<br />Supervisors establishing the Fiscal Program for the Arterial Highway Financing
<br />Program for the Fiscal Year 1959-60,
<br />
<br /> From Boundary Commuission reference proposed annexation of territory to the
<br />City of Santa Aha (Delhi and Greenville SJ W. Annex) advising the boundaries of the
<br />proposed ----~ti~ are reasonably definite and certain although it cuts property
<br />lines,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary C~maaission reference proposed annexation of territory to
<br />the City of Garden Grove (~nne. xation No. 68) advising the boundaries of the proposed
<br />annexation are reasonably definite $-~ certain although it cuts property lines;
<br />the proposed annexation overlaps the proposed "west Santa Aha Anr~x" to the City of
<br />Santa Ana,~and suggests the City make this proposed annexation follow along existing
<br />property lines and eliminate the line that cuts through the property; this proposed
<br />annexation overlaps the proposed "West Santa Aha ~nnex" to the City of Santa Aha
<br />approved by the Boundary Co,w,t ssion January 19, 1959,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|