Laserfiche WebLink
of Survey Map - <br />Industrial Enterprises <br /> <br />Preliminary Record <br />of Survey Map <br />Edward Hall <br /> <br />Tentative Map <br />Tract No. 1~60 <br />A~ninister Inveatment <br />Co. ~4 <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1072 <br />Suburban Builders, Inc. <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1079 <br />Ruth M. Hicks <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1082 <br />Gerald J. Garcia <br /> C °-'3 / <br /> <br /> On motion of Councflm~n Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, Preliminary Record <br /> <br /> of Sur~ey Map filed by Industrial Enterprises, defining a parcel located on the <br /> south side of Chestnut Street approximately 1000 feet east of McClay Street, was <br /> approved subject to conditions. <br /> <br /> Nayor Hetn]y dis~lualified himself on the following matter and Vice-Mayor Markel <br /> assumed the Chair. C~cation was read from the Planning Department reference <br /> Preliminary Record of Survey Map filed by Edward Hall dividf=g into two parcels <br /> property located generally between Cedar Street on the west, Standard Avenue on the <br /> east and approximately 400 feet north of St. Andrew Place. Attorney Harold Heinly, <br /> on behalf of Leonard Earl and Mr. Barker, stated Mr. Ball is not the record owner <br /> of all the property concerned and did not understand how Mr. ~1 l could file an <br /> application for a subdivision and not be record title holder of the property involved. <br /> Also, the Preliminary Record of Survey Map should be re-submitted, or, Mr. <br /> should settle this problem with regard to the property he sold to Leonard Earl and <br /> <br /> Mr. Barker, and suggested the matter be continued until such time as Messrs. Earl, <br /> Barker and Hall were present. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould <br /> <br /> ,.and carried, the matter was continued until May 4, 1959. Mayor Heialy resumed the Chai~ <br /> On motion of Councl!~ Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, Tentative Map of <br /> <br /> Tract No. 1960 filed by Am~inister Investment Company, subdivider and owner, creat- <br /> ing 28 residential lots on the east side of Ktng Street at the intersection of <br /> <br /> Ninth and Tenth Streets, was approved subject to conditions. <br /> <br /> On motion of ~ouncLlsm~n Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the reco~ndation <br /> <br />of the P],nning Con~nission was approved' and Variance Application No. 1072 filed by <br />Suburban Builders, Inc., granted to permit erection of a sign, 8 :feet by l0 feet in <br />size (instead of 8 feet by 12 feet, originally requested), for a period not to <br />exceed six months, on property situated on the south side of East Seventeenth Street, <br />between 1720 and 1730, in lt*t District, subject to a condition. <br /> <br /> On motion of Councfl,mn Hubbard, seconded by Markel and carried, the recommendation <br /> <br />of the Planning Commission was approved and Variance Application No. 1079 filed by <br />Ruth M. Hicks granted to permit construction of a two-story, six-unit apartment <br /> <br /> house, consisting of two two-bedroom units and four one-bedroom units, the existing <br />single- <br />_f~mf~y dwelling to be removed, on property situated at 823 North Parton Street, in <br /> <br />R-2 District, subject to conditions. <br /> <br />Con~unication was read from the Planning Commission recon~nending approval of Variance <br />Application No. 1082 filed by Gerald J. Garcia to permit construction of a single- <br />fsmtly three-bedroom house on rear portion of lot, on property at 1531 West Second <br />Street, in R-2 Di~trict, subject to conditions. It was moved by Councilman Gould~ <br />seconded by Hubbard and carried, that Variance Application No. 1082 be granted sub- <br />ject to conditions. It was moved by Councilman Gould and seconded by Markel that <br />the Variance Application be reconsidered. <br /> <br />Roll Call Ayes Councilmen Stanley C. GoUld, Jr., J. Ogden Markel, Dale H. <br /> Heinly <br /> Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, A. A. Hall <br /> Councilmen None <br /> <br /> Noes <br /> Absent <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilm-n Gould, seconded by Markel and carried, that a Resolution <br /> <br />be adopted overruling the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the Variance <br />be granted subject to conditions, and the further condition that the applicant be <br />required to pave to City standards and specifications that portion of Forest Avenue <br />whic~ abuts his property. Andrew Conti, representing the applicant, s~ated the <br />Planning Commission approved the Variance with the stipulation that Mr. GaTcia : <br /> <br /> <br />