|
Tustin and Freeway
<br />N. W. Annex"
<br />
<br />Variance applications
<br />Nos. llS1, 1152, 1153~
<br />1159, 1163, 1165, and
<br />1166
<br />
<br />Variance Application
<br />No. ll61 - Robert M.
<br />Muller
<br />Reso. No. 59-216 C
<br />Granting Variance
<br />
<br />Variance Application
<br />No. ll54 - Harold Adsms
<br />Reso. No. 59-217
<br />Granting Variance
<br />
<br />~ayor Hall announced this is the date set for hearing proteS%s: on ~he annexation of i
<br />territory designated "Tustin and Freeway N. W. Annex" and stated that on August 3,
<br />
<br />1959, the City Council ~dopted Resolution No. 59-207 canceling all proceedings in
<br />
<br />regard to this annexation.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following
<br />
<br />Variance Applicati~s w~re granted subject to conditions, as applicable, and as
<br />
<br />reccmnended by the Planning Commission:
<br />
<br />Variance Application No. 1151 filed by Hershel R. Chancy to construct a thr~e-bedroom
<br />single family dwelling with carport, approximately 1284 square feet, on front part of
<br />lot on property situated at 2127 South Orange Avenue, in R-1 District, subject to
<br />conditions,
<br />
<br /> Variance Application No. 1152 filed by John B. Chancy to construct a three bedroom
<br />/ single family dwelling with carport, 1284 square feet, on front part of lot on
<br /> property situated at 2129 South Orange Avenue, in R-1 District, subject to conditions,
<br />
<br />Variance Application No. 1153 filed by Ray Erhardt to construct, maintain and display
<br />one standard l2½foot by 46 foot illuminated outdoor advertising b~lletin, to be
<br />erected over the roof of existing motel building "North Star Lodge" on property
<br />situated at 2697 North Main Street, in R-1 District· subject to a condition,
<br />
<br />Counc~lm~n Heinly disqualified himself on the following motion. Variance Application
<br />No. 1159 filed by William H. Siemsen to construct a warehouse, waiving the 10 foot
<br />rear yard requirement on property situated at 1100 East 17th Street, approximately
<br />650 feet south of 17th Street, in C-2 District,
<br />
<br /> Variance Application No. 1163 filed by Donald L. and Vivian Shaw to remove existing
<br />residence and establish a parking lot to be used by the Ebell Society of the Santa
<br />/Ama Valley, on property situated at 715 Mortimer Street, in R-3 District, subject to
<br /> conditions,
<br />
<br />Variance Application No. 1165 filed by J. P. Gonzales to build an additional single
<br />family dwelling on property situated ~t ll041 16th Street, in R-1 District, subject
<br />to conditions, and
<br />
<br />Councilman Heinly disq,,al ified himself on the f~llowing motion. Variance Application
<br />No. 1166 filed by the Tietz Corporation to construct a single family dwelling,
<br />decreasing the rear yard frc~ the required 20 feet to 12 feet, waiving eight feet of
<br />the rear yard requirements on property situated at the northeast corner of Smeltzer
<br />Avenue and Verano Street, on Lot 64, Tract No. 3528, in R-1 District, subject to
<br />conditions.
<br />
<br />Conmunication was read from the Planning Commission recommending approval to erect
<br />
<br />a triplex on the lot with five existing units, as shown on plot plan, on property
<br />
<br />sitaated at 15112 Newhope Street, .in R-1 District, subject to conditions.
<br />
<br />Mr. Clarence
<br />
<br />Hall, representing the applicant, objected to the paving requirement. The Council
<br />
<br />having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman
<br />
<br />Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />'~esolution No. 59-216 granting Variance on Application No.
<br />1161 without imposing all conditions"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly, A.A.Hall
<br />Noes, Councilmen STmnley C. Gould, Jr., Bob Brewer
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Communication was read frc~ the Planning C~ission recormmending denial of Variance
<br />
<br />Application No. 1154 filed by Harold K. and Jean R. Adams to construct a five unit
<br />
<br />apartment on rear half of the lot, with one existing single family residence, on
<br />
<br />property at 933 Cypress Avenue, in R-2 $istrict; ten parking spaces will be provided
<br />
<br />on the property. Ma-. Mar~dith spoke in favor of the Variance and stated there are
<br />
<br />apartments in the area and ample parking will be provided. Joe 0Jeda stated he is
<br />
<br />of the opinion the applicant will remove the older house later. The Council having
<br />
<br />unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Heinly,
<br />
<br />seconded by Gould and carPied, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 59-2-17 gr~nting Variance on Application No. 1154
<br />where conditions were modified"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />
<br />No~ s · Counc ~ ~ men
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br />Dele H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A.A.Hall
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />
<br />
|