~hopping center. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolu-Ii ~
<br />
<br />tion, on motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following!l
<br />
<br />Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No~ 59-281 granting variance on Application No. 1195 filed by
<br /> Ernest and Ellen Stenlund bymodifyin§one of the recommended conditions"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote: il~'. ~
<br />Ayes, Councilmen RoyalBob Brewer,E' Hubbard,A. A. HallStanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, ,111
<br />
<br /> Noes~ Councilmen None
<br /> Absent, Councilmen None
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1196 ,~/ "
<br />!!A. L. Perkins ~
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No.. 119~ G ~'
<br />Robert G. Thomas
<br />
<br />Variance Appl, No. 1202
<br />Savage Construction Co.
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1198
<br />L. Cordova
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1199
<br /> '0hn H. and Edna Hamond
<br />
<br />Communication was read from the lanning Commission, submitting without recc~menda~
<br />tion, duetoa tie vote, Variance Application No. 1196, filed by A. L. Perkins, to !1
<br />waive the requirement that units be attached on property situated at 1911 West 16t~l
<br />Street in R-2 District? Applicant stated.that the house was built
<br />
<br />after 1939, and he wishes to build another unit w~chwould be unattached; that he
<br />
<br />is desirous of keeping his house in line with others, and there is now a double
<br />
<br />garage. On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Variance
<br />
<br />Application No. 1196 was granted, subject to a condition.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Gould, sec~onded by Hubbard and carried, the reco~nendat~ on
<br />of the Planning Commission was approved, and Variance Application No. 1197, filed
<br />
<br />by Robert G. Thomas, to erect two units above an exL~ting four-car garage on pro-
<br />
<br />petty situated at 1334 Eas~ L4th Street, in R-2 District, was granted, subject to
<br />
<br />conditions.
<br />.
<br />On motion of Councilman Gould, secmded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendation
<br />
<br />of the Planning Commission was approved, and Variance Application No. 1202, filed
<br />
<br />by Savage Construction Ccmpany, to decrease the required front yard from 60 feet
<br />
<br />from center line to 50 feet from center line on Tract 2033, on property situated
<br />
<br />at the southwest corner of Bolsa Avenue and Verano Street in R-1 District~ was granted
<br />
<br />subject to a condition of the Department of Public Works.
<br />,,
<br />On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recmmmendation
<br />
<br />of the Planning Commissi on was approved, and Variance Application No. 1198, filed
<br />
<br />by L. Cordova, to move a single-family dwelling onto this lot with an existing
<br />
<br />single-family dwelling on property situated at 304 Central Avenue, in R-1 District,?
<br />
<br />was granted, subject to conditions.
<br />,,
<br />C~mmunication was read from the Planning Con~nission recommending denial Of Variance
<br />
<br />Application No. 1199, filed by John H. and Edna Hammond, to erect a two-story, 16-
<br />
<br />unit apartment building on property situated at 833 North Baker Street, in R-1
<br />
<br />District. CGnmunication was read from B. Edgar Johnson, 910 North Westwood Avenue,
<br />
<br />protestir~ the erection of a two-story apartment building in a neighborhood of
<br />
<br />single-family homes, and on motion of CounciLman Brewer, secunded by Gould and
<br />
<br />carried, the protest wasreceived and filed. Mr. I. W. Barber, 918 North Baker
<br />
<br />Street, spokesman for a group of protestants, stated if this Variance is granted th
<br />
<br />values of the properties will decrease, cars will be parked on the street, and this~i
<br />is an R-1 District and nice hcm'es are in the area. l~s. Bonnie B~own, lll40 W.
<br />Street, ~rs. Edna Linville, 924 North Baker Street, and Mr. A. D. Garon, 918 North
<br />Baker Street, protested for the same reasons as stated by -~. Barber. On motion of?
<br />
<br />Councilman Gould, sec~nded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendation of the Plan-
<br />
<br />'ning Commiss~ on was approved and Variance Application No. 1199 denied.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|