Laserfiche WebLink
~hopping center. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolu-Ii ~ <br /> <br />tion, on motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following!l <br /> <br />Resolution entitled: <br /> <br /> "Resolution No~ 59-281 granting variance on Application No. 1195 filed by <br /> Ernest and Ellen Stenlund bymodifyin§one of the recommended conditions" <br /> <br />was considered and passed by the following vote: il~'. ~ <br />Ayes, Councilmen RoyalBob Brewer,E' Hubbard,A. A. HallStanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, ,111 <br /> <br /> Noes~ Councilmen None <br /> Absent, Councilmen None <br />Variance Appl. No. 1196 ,~/ " <br />!!A. L. Perkins ~ <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No.. 119~ G ~' <br />Robert G. Thomas <br /> <br />Variance Appl, No. 1202 <br />Savage Construction Co. <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1198 <br />L. Cordova <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1199 <br /> '0hn H. and Edna Hamond <br /> <br />Communication was read from the lanning Commission, submitting without recc~menda~ <br />tion, duetoa tie vote, Variance Application No. 1196, filed by A. L. Perkins, to !1 <br />waive the requirement that units be attached on property situated at 1911 West 16t~l <br />Street in R-2 District? Applicant stated.that the house was built <br /> <br />after 1939, and he wishes to build another unit w~chwould be unattached; that he <br /> <br />is desirous of keeping his house in line with others, and there is now a double <br /> <br />garage. On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Variance <br /> <br />Application No. 1196 was granted, subject to a condition. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Gould, sec~onded by Hubbard and carried, the reco~nendat~ on <br />of the Planning Commission was approved, and Variance Application No. 1197, filed <br /> <br />by Robert G. Thomas, to erect two units above an exL~ting four-car garage on pro- <br /> <br />petty situated at 1334 Eas~ L4th Street, in R-2 District, was granted, subject to <br /> <br />conditions. <br />. <br />On motion of Councilman Gould, secmded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendation <br /> <br />of the Planning Commission was approved, and Variance Application No. 1202, filed <br /> <br />by Savage Construction Ccmpany, to decrease the required front yard from 60 feet <br /> <br />from center line to 50 feet from center line on Tract 2033, on property situated <br /> <br />at the southwest corner of Bolsa Avenue and Verano Street in R-1 District~ was granted <br /> <br />subject to a condition of the Department of Public Works. <br />,, <br />On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recmmmendation <br /> <br />of the Planning Commissi on was approved, and Variance Application No. 1198, filed <br /> <br />by L. Cordova, to move a single-family dwelling onto this lot with an existing <br /> <br />single-family dwelling on property situated at 304 Central Avenue, in R-1 District,? <br /> <br />was granted, subject to conditions. <br />,, <br />C~mmunication was read from the Planning Con~nission recommending denial Of Variance <br /> <br />Application No. 1199, filed by John H. and Edna Hammond, to erect a two-story, 16- <br /> <br />unit apartment building on property situated at 833 North Baker Street, in R-1 <br /> <br />District. CGnmunication was read from B. Edgar Johnson, 910 North Westwood Avenue, <br /> <br />protestir~ the erection of a two-story apartment building in a neighborhood of <br /> <br />single-family homes, and on motion of CounciLman Brewer, secunded by Gould and <br /> <br />carried, the protest wasreceived and filed. Mr. I. W. Barber, 918 North Baker <br /> <br />Street, spokesman for a group of protestants, stated if this Variance is granted th <br /> <br />values of the properties will decrease, cars will be parked on the street, and this~i <br />is an R-1 District and nice hcm'es are in the area. l~s. Bonnie B~own, lll40 W. <br />Street, ~rs. Edna Linville, 924 North Baker Street, and Mr. A. D. Garon, 918 North <br />Baker Street, protested for the same reasons as stated by -~. Barber. On motion of? <br /> <br />Councilman Gould, sec~nded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendation of the Plan- <br /> <br />'ning Commiss~ on was approved and Variance Application No. 1199 denied. <br /> <br /> <br />