Laserfiche WebLink
377 <br /> <br />Hearing <br />Amend~ Appl No. 302 <br />initiated by Plann.Comm. <br />Ordinance <br /> <br />Hearing <br />Establish future <br />right-of-way lines <br />along portions of <br />Bristol Street <br />Ordinance <br /> <br />Hearing <br />Change portion <br />Ritchey Street <br />Reso. No.60-27 <br /> <br />Variance Appl.No.12h3 <br />Anna P. Jensen <br /> <br />This being the date set for hearing on Amendment Application No. 304, initiated by <br />the Planning Commission, amending Sectional District Map 2h-5-10, to reclassify <br />from the C District to the C-1-PK District, property at the northeast corner of <br />Edinger Street and Bristol Street, or more precisely described as that area bounded <br />on the south by Edinger Street~ on the west by Bristol Street, on the east by an <br />alley approximately 175 feet east of Bristol Street, and on the north by a line ~l <br />feet north of the center line of Edinger Street (Lot 12h through Lot 1280 of Tract <br />l~lS); no protests were received and the hearing was closed. On motion of Counc~l- <br />man Gould, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance entitled~ <br /> <br /> "Ordinance amending hrticle IX of the S~.nta Aha Municipal Code <br /> to change district classificati~ on Amendment ~pplication No. <br /> 304 and amending Sectional District Map 2h-5-10" <br /> <br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading. <br /> <br />This being the date set for hearing to establish future right-of-way lines on <br />Bristol Street, south of Delhi Road, from present Talbert Avenue to De]hi Road, on <br />both sides, measured 50 feet from and at right angles to the construction center <br />line; no protests were received and the hearing was closed. On motion of Council- <br />man Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Ordinance entitled: <br /> <br /> "Ordinance establishing future right-of-way lines along <br /> portions of Bristol Street <br /> <br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading. <br /> <br />This being the date set for hearing to change Ritchey Street, between the easterly <br />extension of Edinger Street and Delhi Road, from a secondary highway (84-foot <br />right-of-way) to a local street (60-foot right-of-way); no protests were received <br />and the hearing was closed. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of <br />the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Reinly and carried, <br />the following Resolution entitled: <br /> <br /> "Resolution No. 60-27 changing a portion of Bitchey Street from a <br /> secondary highway to a lccal street" <br /> <br />was considered and passed by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. H~ll <br />Noes, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr. <br />Absent, Councilmen None <br /> <br />Communication was again read from the Planning Commission recommending denial of <br />Variance Application No. 1243, filed by Anna P. Jensen, to establish parking lots <br />on property at 1813 and 1817 West 16th Street, in the R-2 District, and to waive <br />the ten-foot rear-yard requirement on property at 1832 West 17th Street, in the <br />C-I-PK District. Warren Sikora, 401 W. Eighth Street, again protested the granting <br />of the Variance for a parking lot on 16th Street, stating this would benefit an <br />isolated i~dividual case and permit spot zoning, at the expense of the balance of <br />the property within the area, which is in the R-2 District; further, the Variance <br />would permit parking up to the front line of the sidewalk, and requested that the <br />Variance be denied. Leroy Brackman, 1806 W. 16th Street, again stated this is a <br />newly-developed area consisting of attractive duplexes and triplexes, and the owners <br />could not expect a reasonable return on their property if the proposed parking lot <br />is allowed. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Gould that the <br />Variance be denied. M o t ion lost for lack of a second. Councilman Hubbard <br />disqualified himself on this matter. It was moved by Councilman Heinly, and <br />seconded by Brewer, that a Resolution be adopted overruling the actdon of the <br />Planning Commission, and grant the Variance on condition that a concrete wall <br /> <br /> <br />