377
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Amend~ Appl No. 302
<br />initiated by Plann.Comm.
<br />Ordinance
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Establish future
<br />right-of-way lines
<br />along portions of
<br />Bristol Street
<br />Ordinance
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Change portion
<br />Ritchey Street
<br />Reso. No.60-27
<br />
<br />Variance Appl.No.12h3
<br />Anna P. Jensen
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing on Amendment Application No. 304, initiated by
<br />the Planning Commission, amending Sectional District Map 2h-5-10, to reclassify
<br />from the C District to the C-1-PK District, property at the northeast corner of
<br />Edinger Street and Bristol Street, or more precisely described as that area bounded
<br />on the south by Edinger Street~ on the west by Bristol Street, on the east by an
<br />alley approximately 175 feet east of Bristol Street, and on the north by a line ~l
<br />feet north of the center line of Edinger Street (Lot 12h through Lot 1280 of Tract
<br />l~lS); no protests were received and the hearing was closed. On motion of Counc~l-
<br />man Gould, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance entitled~
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance amending hrticle IX of the S~.nta Aha Municipal Code
<br /> to change district classificati~ on Amendment ~pplication No.
<br /> 304 and amending Sectional District Map 2h-5-10"
<br />
<br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing to establish future right-of-way lines on
<br />Bristol Street, south of Delhi Road, from present Talbert Avenue to De]hi Road, on
<br />both sides, measured 50 feet from and at right angles to the construction center
<br />line; no protests were received and the hearing was closed. On motion of Council-
<br />man Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Ordinance entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance establishing future right-of-way lines along
<br /> portions of Bristol Street
<br />
<br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing to change Ritchey Street, between the easterly
<br />extension of Edinger Street and Delhi Road, from a secondary highway (84-foot
<br />right-of-way) to a local street (60-foot right-of-way); no protests were received
<br />and the hearing was closed. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of
<br />the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Reinly and carried,
<br />the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 60-27 changing a portion of Bitchey Street from a
<br /> secondary highway to a lccal street"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. H~ll
<br />Noes, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr.
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Communication was again read from the Planning Commission recommending denial of
<br />Variance Application No. 1243, filed by Anna P. Jensen, to establish parking lots
<br />on property at 1813 and 1817 West 16th Street, in the R-2 District, and to waive
<br />the ten-foot rear-yard requirement on property at 1832 West 17th Street, in the
<br />C-I-PK District. Warren Sikora, 401 W. Eighth Street, again protested the granting
<br />of the Variance for a parking lot on 16th Street, stating this would benefit an
<br />isolated i~dividual case and permit spot zoning, at the expense of the balance of
<br />the property within the area, which is in the R-2 District; further, the Variance
<br />would permit parking up to the front line of the sidewalk, and requested that the
<br />Variance be denied. Leroy Brackman, 1806 W. 16th Street, again stated this is a
<br />newly-developed area consisting of attractive duplexes and triplexes, and the owners
<br />could not expect a reasonable return on their property if the proposed parking lot
<br />is allowed. The hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Gould that the
<br />Variance be denied. M o t ion lost for lack of a second. Councilman Hubbard
<br />disqualified himself on this matter. It was moved by Councilman Heinly, and
<br />seconded by Brewer, that a Resolution be adopted overruling the actdon of the
<br />Planning Commission, and grant the Variance on condition that a concrete wall
<br />
<br />
<br />
|