|
492
<br />
<br />Request
<br />Maximino Preciado
<br />(La Paloma Cafe)
<br />
<br />Variance Applications
<br />(granted)
<br />
<br />No. 1352
<br />Abraham R.Campos
<br />
<br />No. 1355
<br />Dr. Charles W. Turner
<br />
<br />No. 1356
<br />Harry van I~aarhoven
<br />
<br />Variance Appl.No.131
<br />William R. Jackson
<br />
<br />Variance Appl.No. 1348
<br />Rom Investment Company
<br />
<br /> beverages, Frank Ramirez, 901½ E. hth Street, questioned why a dance permit shoul~i
<br /> be allowed only to a place holding an "On-Sale" General License permitting the sale
<br /> of alcoholic beverages, and Councilm~n Gould explained that the proposed Ordinance
<br /> would change that condition. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by
<br /> Heinly and carried, that the "Ordinance amending and repealing portions of Part 7,
<br /> Chapter 3 of Article VI of the Santa ^na Municipal Code regulating dance halls and
<br /> dancing" be postponed until the meeting of August l, 1960.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the request of
<br /> Maximino Preciado, o~mer of the LaPaloma Cafe, ?00 E. hth Street, for permit to use
<br /> the property at the rear oF the Cafe to construct a patio and use said patio for
<br /> dining and dancing, was received and filed.
<br />
<br /> On motion of CounciLman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the recommendations
<br /> of the Planning C6mmiSsion ware aPProved, and the following Variance APplications
<br /> granted:
<br />
<br /> Variance Application No, 1352~ filed by Abraham R. Csmpos, to'remove existing
<br /> buildings and build a duplex with two-bedroom units, with an attached double garage,
<br /> on property at 2241 So. Kilson Drive~ iu P-1 District, in accordance with revised
<br /> plot plan as submitted,
<br />
<br /> Variance Application NO. 1355, filed by Dr. Charles W. Turner, to construct
<br /> an office building eliminating one side-yard requirement, on property at llO East
<br /> Pomona Street and lll East Berkeley Street, in R-2 District, subject to conditions
<br /> and in accordance with revised and completed set of plans, and
<br />
<br /> Variance Application No. 1356~ filed by Harry van Laarhoven, to build a patio
<br /> roof, resulting in a reduced rear yard of 7 feet 8 inches, on property at 21~9 So.
<br /> Rene Drive, in R-1 District, in accordance with plot plan.
<br />
<br /> again
<br /> On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Heinly and carried, action was/continued,
<br />
<br /> pending a report from the Planning Commission on Variance Application No. 1317,
<br /> filed by William R. and Wanda Jackson, to build two additional single-family dwell-
<br /> ings on a lot with two existing dwellings, on property at 5017 W. Fifth Street, in
<br /> R-1 District, subject to conditions.
<br />
<br /> Communication was presented from the Planning Con~nissfon recommending approval of
<br /> Variance Application No. 13~8, filed by Rom Investment Company, to build an R-3
<br /> development (7 apartment houses, with a total of 60 one-bedroom units) on property
<br /> at the northeast corner of Standard and Wilshire Avenues, in R-1 Distr~ct, subject
<br /> to conditions. Petitions Mere presented signed by 14 persons, 85 persons, from
<br />
<br />Mrs. Mary Uyesugi, ll~6 E. Wilshire Avenue, and from James W. Mayo, ll06 E. Oxford
<br />Street, objecting to the Variance, and on motiGa of Councilman Gould, seconded by
<br />Hubbard and carried, the petitions were received and filed. Joseph Ralston,
<br />lll5 Griffin Place, representing twenty residents in the area who stood in protest,
<br />stated this is an R-1 zone with too many apartments going into an already overcrowded
<br />area, and that the one-bedroom dwellings were also being occupied by children for whom
<br />there was no play area, nor adequate school facilities. Also, as the apartment occu-
<br />pants were mostly transient, there was little or no care for the property they occu-
<br />pied or the property of others, and submitted pictures depicting strewn trash and
<br />overcrowded boxes of litter. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould
<br />and carried, the pictures were received and filed. Mrs. John Church, ll~5 E. Wilshire
<br />Avenue, stated there are 350 apartments within a square block radius, with many
<br />trash and littered cans back of the apartment buildings, and as there are no garages,
<br />parking on the streets, or in a cul-de-sac, is necessary, and requested that the
<br />Variance be denied, permitting n o further construction of apartments in this
<br />residential area. Attorney Robert V. Faust~ 118 So. Los Angeles Street, Anaheim,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|