|
Resolution
<br />l!Salary and Wage
<br /> Proposal
<br /> ~ ~/~/
<br />
<br />Reso.No. 60-181
<br />Salary and Wage
<br />Schedules
<br />
<br />Communications
<br />Boundary Commission,
<br />City of Orange, et al
<br />
<br />It was moved byCouncilman Gould and seconded by Hubbard, that a Resolution be
<br />
<br />adopted for the salary and ~rage schedules for the employees of the City of Santa
<br />
<br />Ana, as outlined ~nder Proposal No. 1.
<br />
<br />Roll Call
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Goulds Jr.
<br />Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />None
<br />
<br />Motion lost.
<br />
<br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolutions on motion of
<br />
<br />CounciLman Heinly, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Resolution entitl
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 60-181 amending Section 3 of Resolution No.58-281"
<br />
<br />revising and establishing the Basic Compensation Plan for employees of the City of
<br />
<br />Santa Ana; reassigning schedule numbers to class titles and adding certain classes
<br />
<br />to the list of titles to Section 3 of Resolution No. 58-281, which is tantamount
<br />
<br />to Proposal No. 2, effective September 1, 1960, was considered and passed by the
<br />
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A.A.Hall
<br /> Noes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard
<br /> Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />~n motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following com-
<br />
<br />munications were received and filed:
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Con~nission regarding proposed annexation of territory to th~
<br />City of Costa Mesa "Paularino No. 3 Annexation - Revised" and advising the boundar-
<br />ies of the proposed anne×ation are reasonably definite and certain, although it cu~
<br />property lines,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to th~
<br />City of Orange "Annexation No. lhl - Revised" and advising the boundaries of the
<br />proposed annexation are reasonably definite and certain,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to th
<br />City of Orange "~nnexation No. lb2" and advising the boundaries of the proposed
<br />annexation are reasonably definite and certain,
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1677 proposing to
<br />annex certain property located west of Canal Street, north of Helm Avenue, designa-
<br />ted "Annexation No.
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1678 proposing to
<br />~2annex certain property locatednorth of Fairhaven Avenue; between Hewes and Esplan-
<br /> ade Avenues, designated "Annexation No. 141,"
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1679 proposing to
<br />annex certain property located east of Yorba Streets between Palm Avenue and Chapms
<br />Avenue, designated "Annexation No.
<br />
<br /> From the County Surveyor and Road Commissioner ~¢ith copies of Final Accountin
<br />Reports on Arterial Highway Finance Program Projects No. ~; 17th Street - Tustin
<br />Avenue east O.11 miles; and No. 5, 17th street - S~ntiago Avenue to Grand Avenue,
<br />
<br /> From the State Department of Public Works submitting SCR-62 Report of Calif-
<br /> ornia County Road and City Street Deficiencies, in accordance with the provisions
<br />f~/~3of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 62 adopted by the Legislature at its 1959
<br /> session;
<br />
<br /> From the North Bristol Improvement Association opposing Bristol Street as a
<br />six-lane street, as being detrimental to property o~ers, and causing too heavy a
<br />traffic load on the streets and urging concentrated action on forming other paral-
<br />lel north-south arteries to help carry the traffic load, as well as creating lel~c-b
<br />turn ~slands at strategic points for the orderly flow of traffic~
<br />
<br /> From the Attorney reference suit against the City where true party in interes
<br />~3~ is County Sanitation Districts,
<br />
<br /> Application of The Western Union Telegraph Company before the Public Utili-
<br />ties Commission for an order authorizing it to increase and revise certain intra-
<br />state rates and regulations applicable to telegraph service within the State,
<br />
<br /> Application filed by Public Utilities Commission, Case No. 6898, San Francisco
<br />office, for'an order instituting investigation for the purpose of establishing a
<br />gp~jlist for the year 1961 of railroad grade crossings of city streets or county roads
<br /> most urgently in need of separations or existing separations in need of alteration
<br /> or reconstruction as contemplated by Section 189 of the Streets and Highways Code,
<br />
<br /> Minutes of the 163rd meeting of the Board of Trustees, Orange County Mosquit~
<br />Abatement District; dated August 19, 1960, and.
<br />
<br />~d
<br />
<br />
<br />
|