04-03-1961 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

:169 ' ~oll Call Ayes, Noes, Absent, ,, Not Voting, Appeal Appl No. 16 Variance Appl.No. 1455 Gordon Deckert Reso. No. 61-88 granting Variance Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly, A. A. Hall CounciLmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr. Appeal Application No. 16 of Gordon Deckert was presented on Variance Application No. 1~55, to construct a warehouse in the R-2 District, on property at 409 South Main Street, wherein the City Council appealed the Zouiug Administrator's decision in order to reconsider Condition No. 2 of the Variance pertaining to a required three-foot side yard. The Council having unanimouslywaived the reading of the Resolution, o~ motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Helnly and carried, the following Resolution entitled: "Resolution No. 61-88 granting Variance after elimination of Condition 2 on Appeal Application No. 16" was considered and passed by the following vote: Appeal Appl. No. 17 ~Variance Appl.No.1258 L. A. Leversen Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Councilmen None Appeal Application No. 17 of Francis X. Kluewer, 1826 Martha Lane, was presented in protest of Variance Application No. 1458, filed by L. A. Leversen, to erect an addition to a single-family dwelling, which will project into the required rear yard, on property at 1817 Martha Lane, in the R-1 District, and stating: (1) The proposed encroachment is not necessary for additional living space; (2) Public notification was misleading in its wording; and (3) Variance Application No. 805, filed by Ottmar H. Schutte, was approved, subject to its being a one-story develop- ment, on property at 1901 W. Washington Street. Mr. Kleuwer reaffirmed the points outlined in his appeal, and stated there were no second-story dwellings in the vi- cinity at the present time, and the proposed structure would be too close to the surrounding residences, tending to decrease the value of the property. Mr. L. A. Leversen, 1817Martha Lane, applicant of Variance Application No. 1258, stated another bedroom and family roc~ were needed to adequately provide for his seven- member family, and as the property is 60 by 10~ feet and too small to build out, it will be necessary for him to add one story to his dwelling. Mr. Leversen sub- mitted a plot plan and c.~iunications dated March 31, 1961, from Garrett Realty, 1736 West 17th Street, J. R. Gibson Co~pany, 1211 North Broadway, and Jim Scobie Associates, 917 West 17th Street, all favoring the proposed two-story addition as an improvement from an econ(mzic standpoint. On motion Of Councilman Gould, second~l by Hubbard and carried, the plot plan and communications were received and filed. Kenneth Dole, 1813 M~rtha Lane, Gordon Hendry, 1818 Meriday Lan~and W. B. Causey, 1802 Meriday Lane, stated their properties were t,,,ediately adjacent to the Levers~n residence and were not in favor of the elevation change. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Brewer and carried, Appeal Application No. 17 of Francis X. Kleuwer was denied, and Variance Application No. 1~58, filed by L. A. Leversen, Appeal Appl.No. 18 Variance Appl.No. 1256 Paul V. Banks Reso. No. 61-89 granting Variance granted, subject to conditions. Appeal Application No. 18 of Paul V. Banks was presented on Variance Application No. 1456, to erect an office building with less than the required off-street l~.~k- lng, o~ property at 1007 South Bristol Street, in the C-1 District, wherein the Planning Commission rec~ended denial because the applicant declined to build ten feet behind the front line of adjoining build~-g. The applicant stated he is de- strous of constructing the building in line with existing buildings, there now are two driveways off Bristol Street and two off Cubbon Street, therefore making it