90-098 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Finding 3: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. 4].3 Facts in Support of Findings The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the design considerations by the project applicant and the traffic and air quality mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project. These measures are identified in the Traffic/Circulation and Air Quality sections of this Statement of Findings. Although these measures will lessen the impact of the jobs to housing imbalance, the effect remains cumulatively significant. This impact is acceptable when weighed against the facts set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. VII. MITIGATION MEASURES FOR IMPACTS CONSIDERED LESS TIIAN SIGNIFICANT This section includes mitigation measures for effects of the project which considered to be less than significant, and, therefore, not required under CEQA. However, these measures will improve the acceptability of the proposed project, and are acceptable under CEQA. Findings are not required for these effects. Effect The need for additional police services will be achieved through the use of developer fees and tax revenues generated by the project. The following measures will improve the safety of buildings within the new development. Mitigation Measures Lighting of the project site shall comply with the Santa Ana Security Ordinance. Lighting plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Aha prior to issuance of building permits. Requirements for private security systems shall be determined by the City of Santa Ana Building Department prior to issuance of occupancy permits, and shall be installed by the project applicant accordingly. JBI/08850001.SOF 25