03-19-1962 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

426 !ommunications On motion of Councilman Brewer~ seconded by Schlueter and carried, the following ~oundary C~is sion; Board of Supervisors; communications were received, filed and where applicable referred to the proper et al Departments for processing: Frown the Boundary Com~ssion regarding proposed annexation of territory to the City of Santa Ana designated "Lyon and Main - Southeast Annexation," located at the southeast corner of Lyon Street and Main Street (Tustin), advising the boundaries of the proposed annexation are not definite and certain and all documents were re- . ferred back to the City for correction and resub~ission~ From the Boundary C~-~ission regarding proposed annexation of territory to the; City of Orange designated "Annexation No. 18h - Corrected~' located north of La Veta Avenue and east of Prospect Avenue, advising the boundaries of the proposed annexation are reasonably definite and certain, From the Boundary Co~dssion regarding proposed annexation of territory to the City of Orange designated "Annexation No. 185," located north of La Veta Avenue and east of Yorba Street, advising the boundaries of the proposed annexation are reason~ ~1~ably definite and certain, From the Boundary C(~ma~ssi~n regarding proposed de-annexation of territory frc~ the City of Fountain Valley designated "Number A - Corrected," advising the bound- ~a~aries of the proposed de-annexation are reasonably definite and certain, although it cuts property lines, From the Boundary Co.~..~ssion regarding proposed de-annexation of territory from ~the City of Fountain Valley designated "Number B - Corrected," advising the bound- aries of the proposed de-annexation are reasonably definite and certain, From the Boundary C~m,~tssian regarding proposed de-annexation of territory fro~ $~1~he City of Fountain Valley designated "Number C - Corrected," advising the bound- aries of the proposed de-annexation are reasonably definite and certain, From the Board of Supervisors submitting Resolution No. 62-290, adopted Febru- arm 28, 1962~ advising the Petition to change the boundaries of the Tustin School District and the Santa Ana Unified SchoOl District of Orange County was denied, From the Board of Supervisors advising copy of Santa Ana Resolution No. 62-~8, adopted February 19, 1962, changing the name of Sugar Avenue to McFadden Avenue, was received, filed~ and the Clerk instructed to forward copies to the Department of Building and Safety, the Surveyor~ Registration Department, and the Street Nsm~ ng C~..itt ee, From the Board of Supervisors granting pemission to the City of Santa Ana to install Diaphone Horns in cc~mection with the Civil Defense Alerting System, in the vicinity of the Orange County Civic Center, at no cost to the County, From the County Surveyor submitting Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 62-262, adopted February 27, 1962, establishing the 1962-63 fiscal year Arterial Highway Financing Program~ From the State Treasurer submitting Senate Joint Resolution No. 42, relative to opposition to federal income t~xation of the interest derived from public bonds, ~and advising a thorough study of the Resolution should be made by the Oouncil, and requesting consideration be given to the Council's adoption of a similar Resolu- tion to the President and Congress, From Santa Ana Unified and Junior College Districts submitting.Resolution, adopted March 13~ 1962~ to purchase city owned property on the south side of Walnut ,~Street between Flower and Parton Streets, in the sum of $40,500.00, for school ~building use, and advising they are now ready to enter into escrow proceedings at the Orange County Title Company and to sign the necessary papers, From the City of Costa Mesa submitting Resolution No. 62-34, adopted March 5, 1962, entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa reciting certain facts constituting the urgency for inm~ediate action on the Freeway from Palisades Road northerly on Route No. 55," and urging that steps be taken at once to protect the lives and safety of the traveling public and to facilitate the flow of traffic on this important artery, From the County Sanitation Districts submitting copies of Ordinance No. 705 of County Sanitation District No. 7, adopted February 28, 1962, and effective March l, 1962, involving collection of sewer connection charges in that portion of the City in District No. 7, requesting that the Ordinance be made a part of the Council's record, and advising copies of the Ordinance and map should be transmitted to the Building and Planning Departments in order for appropriate City officials to advise property owners and developers in District No. 7 of the connection charges estab- lished, From the Public Utilities Con~issic~ requesting to be advised if the work has been completed, reference City s Application No. A.~2960, for authority to construct Segerstrom Avenue at grade across a drill track of Pacific Electric Railway C~mpany~ From the Public Utilities C~ssion requesting to be advised if the work has been completed, reference City's Application No. A.42976, for authority to construct Central Avenue at grade across a spur track of Pacific Electric Railway Company, From Attorney Robert S. Barnes, lO16 North Broadway, advising Judge West has ~ruled that in the absence of fraud, the annexation of territory at the southwest corner of First Street and Tustin Avenue (The Revere House) is not possible.