|
/464
<br />
<br />Bid acceptance
<br />Recreation Office
<br />Heritage Park
<br />
<br /> [earing
<br />Amend. Appl. No. 382
<br />Ralph J. Cover
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl. No. 61
<br />Hubert Melton
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1636
<br />A.C. Markel and
<br />John Jezowski
<br />Reso. No. 62-94
<br />Granting Variance
<br />
<br />A tabulation of bids was presented for the furnishing and construction of one Recre
<br />ation Office and Patio in Heritage Park, Specification 672-12, as follows:
<br />
<br />Crosby Construction Co.
<br />The Iowa Company, Inc.
<br />R. L. Steinmetz
<br />
<br />Total
<br />$.,99o.0o
<br />~,286.00
<br />~,9~5.00
<br />
<br />10~ Bid Bond
<br />$600.00 Certified Check
<br /> 10% Bid Bond
<br />
<br />Roll Call Ayes,
<br />
<br /> Noes,
<br /> Absent,
<br />
<br />Notion carried.
<br />
<br />On recommendation of the Manager, and on motion of Councilman Brewer, seconded by
<br />Heinly and carried, the lowest aud best bid of The Iowa Company, Inc., was accepted
<br />in the total amount of $~,286.00, and all other bids rejected.
<br />
<br />This being the date set for the continued hearing on Amendment Application No. 382
<br />filed by Ralph J. Cover, amending Sectional District Map 16-5-10, to reclassify
<br />fron the R-2 and A-1 Districts to the R-3 and C-1 Districts, property at the north-
<br />east corner of Sugar (McFadden) Avenue and Newhope Street (a parcel approximately
<br />437 feet on Sugar Avenue by 371 feet on Newhope Street), all as shown on Exhibit
<br />
<br />A.A. B82A; Planning C~l~.,~ssion rec ...... ended denial. Delbert W. Michael, 917 South
<br />
<br />Toland Street, stated the residents in the area favor Planning Department Study
<br />19, and are opposed to the proposed rezoning, as it would be hazardous to have com-
<br />mercial bus--sos opposite the school; it would lower the value of the surrounding
<br />property; and requested Council to continue the good work it has done in the past
<br />by helping to build t~e area in question properly. Douglas Clark, 1510 North Mar-
<br />Less Drive, stated there should be consistency on the thinking of the Council and
<br />the Planning C¢-.i...tssion regarding zone changes, and in keeping with Study 19, which
<br />was presented to and approved by the Council, this area should re~ain R-1 as nearly
<br />as possible, and this area, though not very well developed at the present time, has
<br />a possibility of being a fine residential sectidn of the City. Mrs. Mary P. WaverS,
<br />718 South Gates Street, stated she and her husband have lived in Santa Ana for sev~
<br />years, and are opposed to commercial businesses near their residence. Hearing
<br />closed. It was moved by Councilman Heinly, and seconded by Brewer, that Amendment
<br />Application No. 382, filed by Ralph J. Cover, be denied.
<br />
<br /> CounciLmen Henry H. Schlueter, Dale H. Heinly,
<br /> Bob Brewer, Royal E. Hubbard
<br /> CounciLmen None
<br /> CounciLmen A. A. Hall
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 61 of Hubert Melton was presented on Variance Application Nc
<br />1636, filed by A. C. Markel and John Jezowski, to re-establish a cement contractor'
<br />office and equipment-materials yard in the C-1 District, at 2517 West Edinger Ave-
<br />
<br />hue, wherein the appellant appeals the denial of the Zoning ~dmtnistrator. Jack
<br />
<br />Hall, Civil Engineer, 219 East 17th Street, stated the applicant and the appellant
<br />
<br />are trying to effect a beneficial exchange by moving the contractor's office and
<br />
<br />equipment-materials yard approximately 170 feet east of its present location. Mr.
<br />Hall further stated the property is now operating under a County Variance, and the
<br />City Variance, if granted, would be more restrictive. Charles Swenson, 2221 South
<br />Towner Street, an employee of Nessrs. Markel and Jezowski, stated more room is re-
<br />quired gs the business has been very successful and is expanding. Mr. Arnold,
<br />
<br />1426 Sullivan Street, questioned who would pay the cost of the alley, and whether
<br />
<br />a wall would be built around the alley. The Council having unanimously waived the
<br />
<br />readiD~ of the Resolution, on motion of Councilmmu Heinly, seconded by Schlueter
<br />
<br />end carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />
<br />
|