465
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl. 62
<br />Conditional Use
<br />Permit No. 10~
<br />reschner Invest-
<br />ment Co.
<br />
<br />:Request
<br />~Clara E. Vose
<br /> Extension of Time
<br />IVariance Appl.
<br /> No. 349
<br />
<br />i!Communication
<br />l!Gordon M. Hicks
<br />I Variance Appls.
<br />iNos. 14~9 and
<br />I1609 ~#)3
<br />
<br />Revised Preliminary
<br />Record of Survey 249
<br />D~xander P. Leonard
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 62-94 overruling the Zoning Administrator and granting
<br /> a Variance on Variance Application No. 1636, filed by A. C. Markel and
<br /> John Jezowski; subject to conditions"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Henry H. Schlueter, Dale H. Hein~y,
<br /> Royal E. Hubbard
<br />Noes, Councilmen Bob Brewer
<br />Absent, Councilmen A. A. Hall
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 62 was presented on Conditional Use Permit No. 104, filed
<br />by Greschner Investment Co., to erect a temporary directional sign in the R-2 and
<br />R-1 Districts, at 1138 East 17th Street, wherein the applicant appeals the denial
<br />of the Zoning Administrator. C~am~nication was presented from Union Sign Co. re-
<br />questing the withdrawal of Appeal Application No. 62, and the reikmd of the $15.00
<br />appeal fee, if possible. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Brewer and
<br />carried, the ccmmaunication was received and filed, the request of Union Sign Co.
<br />approved, and Appeal Application No. 62, filed by Greschner Investment Co. was wit~
<br />~x~m~.and no refund to be made.
<br />
<br />Cr..---Anication was presented from Mrs. Clara E. Vose, 1320 Memory Lane, requesting
<br />another three year extension on Variance Application No. 3~9, granted in 1953 for
<br />three years, for a real estate office at 1320 Memory Lane; and stating no changes
<br />have been made on the property and none are anticipated. On motion of Councilman
<br />Brewer, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the request was approved, and a three-
<br />
<br />year extension granted on Variance Application No. 3h9, filed by Mrs. CLara E. Vose
<br />" llth Street, re-
<br />C~nication was presented ~o~1~ M. 'Hicks, Oolema~-Hicks: Corporati0n~ 1t2S
<br />
<br />questing an audience with the Council regarding dedication of property and alley
<br />
<br /> improvements, reference Variance Application No. 1~9, granted March 6, 1961, to
<br /> six -
<br />construct a ~ %unit apartment building at 501 Cypress Avenue; and Variance Applica-
<br />
<br />tion No. 1609, filed February 16, ~62, to construct a six-unit apartment building
<br />on the southwest corner of North Van Ness Street and Washington Avenue. Gor~o~ M.
<br />Hicks, 1123 East llth Street, stated the Planning Department has required the dedi-
<br />cation of a strip 15 feet by 132½ feet for the widening of Washington Avenue, and
<br />the improvement of the alley, as conditions of approval on Variance Application No.
<br />1609, which the applicant is willing to do; but the Planning Department will not
<br />grant the Variance until the alley at 501 Cypress Avenue has been improved, which
<br />alley improvement was one of the conditions of approval on Variance Application No.
<br />14~9, and as the alley improvement was approved by an employee of the Department of
<br />Public Works, a notice of completion was filed, and the building has since been
<br />sold. Mr. Hicks further stated it was not reasonable to deny one Variance Applica-
<br />tion on the basis that a condition of improvement had not been met on another Vari-
<br />ance Application. On motion of Councilmau Heinly, seconded by Brewer and carried,
<br />the communication was ~eceived and filed, and the matter referred to the Planning
<br />Department f~r appropriate action.
<br />
<br />C ....... ~nication was presented from the Planning Department recommending approval of
<br />
<br />Revised Preliminary Record of Survey 249, filed by Dcxander P. Leonard, creating
<br />and combining lots located on the north side of Memory Lane approximately 1,000
<br />feet east of Bristol Street, subject to conditions. Tom Ridgw~y, $201 Wilshire
<br />Boulevard, Los Angeles, stated, with regard to Variance 1627, that the Planning
<br />Department and Department of Public Works have reviewed the three schemes presente~
<br />for the revision of Pre~tmtuary Record of Survey 2~9, and recon~ended disapproval
<br />of Scheme 3, since the extension to the north of this street would require
<br />
<br />
<br />
|