Laserfiche WebLink
590 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT ',4' <br />P.,4GE 4 <br /> <br />~arveyed prior to construction. The proposed park improvements may involve the removal of mature trees. -- <br />Mitigation measures should be considered to .avoid the destruction and/or removal of mature trees. <br /> <br />Finding: Finding <br /> <br />Facts in Support of the b3ndings: <br /> <br />Impact. v on existing plant and animal life can be reduced to iusignificant levels by consultation and <br />coordination and with the rez~oousible resource agencies, including the Califomin D¢lnmment of Fish and <br />Game, the U.S. Fish and P, rddiife Ser~tce, : and the California Native Plant Society when projects are <br />proposed in areas located within or ad]acent to undisturbed areas. Recommended improvements to <br />Santiago Park will require necessmy field investigation and Army Corps of Engineers permitting prior to <br />improvement. Also, the City shall obtain the nece. vsary approvals prior to the disturbance of coast live oak, <br />holly oak, California ocamore$, or other mature trees. Stands of oak, ocamore, or eucalyptus trees shall <br />be incorporated into the prolect design if at all possible. Environmental revlon, for future redevelopment <br />projects, in accordance with CEQ.4, will allow mitigation of any significant adverse impacts on sensitive <br />plant and animal habitats. <br /> <br />E) NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Potential Significant Effect: <br /> <br />.As indicated previously, there art no mineral or resource waraction activities within tbe City. As a resu& <br />future development would not adversely impact any ongoing mining or extn~ction activities. Potential <br />impacts art associated with the construction of new facilities that will require construction aggregate and <br /> <br />other resources and materials commonly used for construction purpases. The consumption <br />materials is not judged to be an adverse impact because supplies are readily avallable~els <br />will berequiredtoprovide power for the new fac~~.,~k ~~td.,~.~,~ ~ ~, ~ <br />Finding: l~ndlng 1 <br /> <br />Facts in Support of the Findings: <br /> <br />No mitigation memut~ are required ~nce no ~'gnificant ~ are ~ <br />individual projects. Construction aggegate will be ~equired~f~t~a~.tal l~ro~~ <br />not expected to be adverse or significant. <br /> <br />NOISE <br /> <br />Potential Significant Effect: <br /> <br />Thc adoption of the Redm~lopment Plan will nog by itself~ result in noise impacts. Pottntial noise impacts <br />will be centered around individual pro]ects arising from their constntction and implementation of the Plan. <br />Local traffic noise I~vels will increase in the vicinity of the major facilities. The I~vel of noise increase will <br />not likely be perceptible to ad]ocent uses. i <br /> <br />Finding: Finding 1 <br /> <br />Facts in Support of the Findings: <br /> <br />Individual projects will have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to ensure that appropriate mitigation <br />measures for noise are provided. Potential adv~e noise impacts are likely to center around demolition <br />and construction activities or the introduction of more intensive recreational uses near noise sensitive aren~ <br />(homes, schools, etc.). Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of &.O0 a~m. to 6.'00 p.m. <br />Monday through F~duy, and 9:.00 a.m~ to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction shall be permitted on <br />Sundays and holidays. Future athletic fields shall be placed in areas which reduce the potential adverse <br /> <br /> <br />