07-16-1962 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C~Gni cat ion, Mrs. Emily J. Hayhurst Reference Variance Appl. No. 1659 filed by Hacienda Garden Develop- ment Company not be used for c~ercial purposes, and up to three cars may be parked in said area. Also, the applicant will not have to blacktop the yard area ~mmediately adjacent to his business office. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the c~ma~nication was received, filed, and referred to the staff for appro- priate action. Communication was presented from Mrs. Emily J. Hayhurst, 915 West 10th Street, owner of property to be affected by Variance Application No. 1659 appealing reversal of the Zoning Administrator's decision, reference Variance Application No. 1659 filed by Hacienda Garden Development C(m~uy to build a subdivision of single family dwellings on property located Immediately east of 3630 West 17th Street and immediately south- west of Pacific Electric Railway Co. right-of-way, to be changed from the M-1 to the R-1 District. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the c~mm~nication was received, filed, and referred to the staff for appropriate action. C~'-~-~,micat ion Planning C~ission "Santa Clara and Deodar South Annex" Co~mmmication Planning Commission "Fairhaven and Grand Southeast Annex" CO~m~UUication Planni~Cc~mission Consider policy for dedication and improve- ments on residential properties on West 6th and West 7th btn Rosita and Emclid (Verano) Sts.~ C~maunicat ion, Mrs. Emily ~ Nayhurst Reference Variance Appl. NO. 1659 filed by Hacienda Garden Develop- ment Company cA ~ Communication was presented from the Planning C~mmission rec~=.ending approval of proposed annexation of territory designated "Santa Clara and Deodar South Annex" consisting of approximately 9.5 acres, located on the south side of Santa Clara Avenue, approximately 600 feet east of Tus~in Avenue. O~ motion of Councilman Hubbard seconded by Heinly and carried, the c~-m~mication was received and filed. Communication was presented from the Planning Commission rec~ending approval of proposed annexation of territory designated "Fairhaven and Grand Southeast Annex" consisting of apprc~m~tely 5.5 acres, located at .the southeast corner of Fairhaven and Old Grand Avenues. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the c~.mication was received and filed. Communication was presented from the Planning Director requesting the Council to con- sider the establishment of a policy for street dedication and improvements on resi- dential properties on West 6th and West 7th StreetS between Rosita and Euclid (Veraho) Streets, and the previous policy in regard to this area has been to suggest the establishment of a private assessment district to defray the cost of providing needed street, curb and sidewalks as well as street lights and other public improvements generally found in residential developments. This i~olicy has been difficult to initiate for it involves private organization, cooperation and implementation to be effective. This area, annexed to the City in April, 1959, has had a history of Variances, Conditional Use Permits and property cuts which tend to indicate that the area is undergoing a developmental change. The Planning Department anticipates further development proposals in this area and a policy should be Considered that will assure the provision of adequate street dedication and improvements for the area in question. On motion of Collnci~man Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the comnnunication wa$~.~ceiv~d, filed, and referred to/staff for appropriate action. Mrs. ~ly J. Hayhurst, ~15 West lOth Street, stated she is the owner of property to be affected by Variance Application No. 1659 filed by Hacienda Garden Development Company to build a subdivision of single family dwellings on property located Immed- iately east of ~630 West 17th Street and immediately southwest of the Pacific Electric Ra~.lway Co. right-of-way, to be cha~ed from the M-1 to the R-1 District, and requested reversal of the Zoning Administrator's decision. Mrs. Eayhurst further stated her property has been zoned M-1 since 19~8 and has been rented for business since that time and steadily occupied by at least one occupant; there is a certain