07-15-1963 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

( C ont inued ) On motion of C~unci]w~a Hubbard, seconded by Cou~cilman Schlueter and carried, the City Council approved the reclassification end instructed the City Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to Exhibit AA 450-A. HEARING - AM~DkmsT APPLIOATI~ 451 DUNTLEY Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Ameh~ment Application ~5! filed by L. M. Duntlay to reclassify fr~ the R .1 to the 1~ 2 District property on the east si~e of Artesia between Pine and Y~rtle.~ Plannln~ Commission Resolution 5632 rock, ended approval of applicant's proposal. The Clerk reported that proper notice of the hearing had been given, that evidence thereto was on file, and that no written ccmmnmications had been received. There being no response to the Mayor's call for testimcmy, the hear!~=_ was cl0sad. On motiom of Councilman Wubbard, eeccaded by Councilman Harvey and carried, the City Council approved the reelaesification and instructed the Cit. y Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to Exhibit AA 451 A, HEARING - APPLICATION 454 SAKIOEA Mayer Hall c~ened the hearing on Amendment Application 454 filed by Roy X. Sakioka to reclassify fram the M 1 to the C 2, R ~ amd R 4 Districts property on the north and south sides of new Mac Arthur Boulevard between Main Street and the Newport Freeway. pla-u~E Commission Resolution 56~ rec~nded denial of the proposal. The Clerk reported that proper notice of the hearing had been given and that evidence thereto was on file. The Clerk also reported that c~ications favoring the reclassification had been received from Leo Herin, 209~ Federal, Costa Mesa, owner of contiguous property north of subject property; James C. Dodson, Jr., Ina L. Stephens, Robert B. Holland, and james A. Stephens, owners of adjacent property. Communications ~pposing the reclassification were received frmathe Piasmad~ae Corporation and frcea LeRoy D. Owen. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried, c~unications were received end ordered filed. Dale Heinly, 611 West Sth Street, attorney for the applicant, stressed the over- abundance of M 1 zoning which resulted when industries had not located locally as rapidly as anticipated; the benefit that would result to other property owners from the sewerage installation; and the increased sales and property taxes paid to the city. Mr. Heinly also noted that the use would not be incc~apetible with the Borg-Warner pl~-t, and that the applicant would not object to a CD zone over]~y.~ Mr. Heinly presented proposed development plans, street layout~ and an aerial photograph of the area shewi~the proposed sewer installation. Leo Rovin, 209~ Federal, Costa Mesa, spoke in favor of the rezonim6, saying it would decrease cc~petition for re~aining industrial property owners. James A. Stevens of Jasco Materials Co., 2540 So. Main Street, spoke lnfavor of the C 1 zoning proposed for Main Street as being beneficial to other c~rcial users. Mr. Stevens also spoke on behalf of Mrs. Lou Stevens, property owner, stating she favored the proposal. Ven Stevens, representing the Planning Ccamaission, stated that this was one of a series of applications represent in g a vast acreage; that the planning C-w--~ssion did not have all of the exhibits presented to the City Council, nor did they know of the suggestion for CD zoning; that the P~-~n2 C~-~ssion wished to consider all the applications for N 1 to residential use at one time because of the vast acreage involved. An exhibit of such applications prepared by the PlanuingDepartment was presented. CITY COUNCIL -152- July 15, 1963