10-07-1963 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

HEARING N~yor Hall opened the hearing on Appeal ~PPEAL 93 - Application 99 filed by Robert Politiski POLITISKI from the Planning Co~mission's denial of Variance 1825 to construct a lb unit, one and two story apartment complex in two buildings at 1803 W. Washington. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was given by the Planning Department as required by law, and that no written communications or objections had been received. There being no response to the Mayor's call for testimony, the hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Hubbard and carried that the City Council uphold the action of the Planning Commission and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution of findings and decision denying Varisnce Application 1825. HEARING ~4ayor Hall opened the hearing on Appeal APPEAL 94 - Application 9~ filed by Mathilda Kane from KANE the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit 15~ to convert the garage of an existing residence into a nursery for five retarded crib-size children at 709 Mountain View Street. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was ~.ren by the Planning Department as required by law and that no written c~-,-~s~icatlons or objections had been received. The applicant stated in her appeal that the matter was not considered on the basis of establishing the nursery in the house instead of the garage. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed. On motion of Councilman Harvey, seconded by Councilman Hubbard and carried, the City Council referred the appeal back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration under the new facts. HEARING Mayor Hall opened the hearingon Appeal APPEAL 95 - Application 95 filed by Clara Vose from ~OSE the Planning Commission's denial of Variance 1826 to construct a service station in the R 1 District at 12~8 Memory Lane. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was given by the Planning Department as required by law, and that a petition had been received, signed by approximately 27 property owaers~ protesting the application. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried, the petition was received and ordered filed. Council heard Frank Pope, 1151 W. 17th Street, attorney for the applicant. Council heard Robert Conley, 2618 N. Louise, representing petitioners protesting, who objected to the application on the basis that developing the remainder of the applicant's property on a residential basis would be impractical and improbable, residential values would be depreciated, and a gas station within 200 or 300 feet of the homes would be a nuisance. Mr. Conley also stated that at the time a variance was granted for the station on the southwest corner the protestants were assured such a variance would not be granted for the R 1 property on the southeast corner. Ogden R. Connor, 12~0 W. Park Lane, stated that no action should be taken until a specific plan for the area is developed by the General Plan consultants. Bruce ~mrtin, 1085 Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, representative for Shell 0il Company, displayed architect's sketch of the type of station to be installed~ drawing attention to its compatibility with the surroundings. The Planning Director pointed out that if a service station is built at this location, it will be difficult to develop the remaining area for residential use, and will probably bring commercial development on Bristol. CITY COUNCIL October 7, 1963