12-16-1963 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On motion of Councilm~ Harvey, seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, the City Council overruled the action of the Planning C~m~ssion and instructed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution granting Conditional Use Permit 1~ subject to applicable conditions. HEARING - AMEND. APP. Vice Mayor Hubbard opened the hearing on ~B5 - LAMBERT Amendment Application ~S~ filed by ?~bara Lambert to reclassify from the M 1 to the R ~ District property south of McFadden, west of Lyon. planning C~mw.~ssion Resolution ~661 rec ...... ended denial without prejudice. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register on November 30, 1963 and that no written c ...... unications had been received. The Pismires= Director reported that the applicant's attorney had agreed to postpon~m*nt of the hearing until after the City Council hears a progress report on the General P!~ by the Plann~nE Consultants. George Maxwell, ~ N. Enstside Avenue, stated he represented several parsons in the audience~, opposed to the application, but they would concur with a continuance. On motion of Counci~w~ Harvey, seconded by Couuc~m~n Gilmore and carried~ the hear~-~= was continued to January 20, 196~ at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber. HEARING - ASSESSM~IT Vice Mayor Hubbard announced the hearing on DISTRICT 221 Resolution 63-171, declaring the Council's intention to order certain sewer construction in Assessment District 221 (Watkins Way). The Clerk presented Affidavit of Publication of Resolution of Intentien, Certificate of Mailing Notice of Hearing, and Certificate of Postt~_= "Notice of Improvement". It was moved by Councilman Harvey~ seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried, that the documents be received and ordered filed with the Clerk. Franklin T. Hamilton, 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, special counsel for the City, briefl~ explained the hearing. Ronald E. Wolford, Assistant Director of Public Works, described the boundaries of the district and the proposed improvements, and stated that in his opinion all lots and parcels within the proposed assessment district will be benefited by the construction of the improve- ments. Mr. Wolford stated the sewers on Seventh Street will be constructed as dry sewers, with outlet dependent upon Assessment District 218~ but that it is in best interest of the property owners to have the sewer with laterals con- structed now to avoid removing the paving in the future. The Clerk reported that no written protests had been filed. Joe Huuman, 1145 S. Sullivan; asked how much the assessment W~Alxl be on S,,11~van and was ~n~ormed by Mr. Wolford that the estimated cost w~uld be about $9.~0 a foot, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving and driveway approaches. Mr. Ba,,-~ stated that he was opposed to having curbs, sidewalks, and paving on Sullivan. Mr. Wolford stated that 55% of the owners on Sullivan Street had signed the assessment district petition. Sam Duran, 3~10 W. 7th, stated he had no protest but asked the cost per foot on 7th Street, and was informed by Mr. Wolford that it was estimate~ at $~3.00 a foot. Ferm-- ~rcon, 3~02 W. 7th, also did not protest but said that by tele- phone he had been told it wonld be less ~han $~.00 a foot) ~n~ that the sewers would be a waste if they c~_1~_~ 't be used. The City Manager explained that proceedi~s f~ Assessment District 218 he~l been terminated because of the number of ~wmers Ol~OSin~, but that man~ needed the sewers urgent~,v ann the district would be re-activated within three months either on the basis of the ori$1nal em$ineering or by negotiation fer access to Garden Gr~ve ~Maitatien District lines. ~ere bain$ no further testimony, the hearing was closed. CITY COUNCIL - 277 - Dec~m~r 16, 1963