01-06-1964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Clerk reported that notice o£ the hearin~ was published in The Santa Ana Register (m December 21, 1~3 and that no written communications had been received. There being no response to the call for testimony, the hearing was closed.. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried that the City Council approve the reclassification and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an emending ordinance according to E~hibit A.A. ~82 A. 483 - SAmara Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Amendment Application ~3 filed by Gary D. Sarver proposin~ to amend Bectional District Map 2-5-10 to reclassify from the C 1 to the C District property o~ the north side of 17th Street Between English Street and the Santa Ana River. Plannin~ Cnmmission Resolution 5662 recommended denial. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Santa Aha Register on December 1~, 1963 an~ that no written cc~munications had Been received. Gary D. Sarver~ ~16 S. California, Orange, applicant, explained the purpose of the requested change was to enlarge his present business no~ operating under variance, since additional land has been acquired and he did not wish to appl~ for a variance each time a change was made on the property. Dean Evans, Assistant Planner for the City~ stated that the variance procedure Is not as lengthy aa a zone change, and it was the Plannin6 C.----~ssin~l's opinion that approval of C 2 zonim~ would establish a precedent~ thereby permitti~ heavier commercial activities on 17th Street, inclu~iz~ Billboards. There being no further testimeny, the hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman ~arvey ar~ carried, that Council deny the reclassification. }~,ARING - APPEAT~ 115 Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Appeal 11~ FRAI~TZ filed by Ruby Marie Frants frcea the Planning Cc~mission's denial of Variance 1857 to Convert a portion of a single residence into a one-operator beauty shop at 11~9 W. McFadden in the R 2 District. The Clerk reported that noti~ '~f the hearing was mailed to adjacent property o~ners on December ~0, 1963 and that no written communications or ob~ectinns had Been recelve~. Ruby Marie Frantz, 113~ W. McFad~len, appellant, stated that the address for the other Beauty shop had Been incorrectl~ shown in the ~indings of Fact and it actuall~ is at 1C2~ %;. McFadden. Donald H. Vance, 113~ ~. Cubbon, spoke in support of the application. On motlo~ of COct~cilma~ Hubbard~ seconded by Councilman Harvey and carried~ Couucil overruled the action of the Planning Co.=~ssion and ~n=tructed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution approving Variance 18~7, suh~ect to applicable conditions. HEARING - APPEAL 116 M~y~r Hall opened the hearing on Appeal RO~I~S Application 116 filed by Calvin G. Rohxa frcm'the Planning Cn~m~qsion's ~enial Of C.U.P. 1~? to construct a 1~9 unit rest hone for the aged with infirmary and related facilities at 20~0 N. Gran~ in the R 1 District. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was mailed to adjacent property owners on December ~0, 1~3, and that no ~itten c~a~a~ni- catinns or objections had been received. Robert S. Barnes, 1016 N. Broadway, attorney for the appellant, stated that dedication of a street seemed to.be the only basis for denial of the application. Will Tester, Zoning Aa~uletrator, stated that the Planning C--~ssion's pr~-~ry concern was for ~u e~et-weet street to be located apprc~-mtel~ ~id~ay C1T~ C~JNCZL - 295 - January 6. lC6k