12-21-1964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The motie~ "that further rea~ing Be waived and Ordinance NS-772 Be passed to second reading" was adopted by unanimous voice vote. HEARING - Ma~Or Hall opened the hearing on 'the SET~ACK CHANGE Pl---ing CommnissiOn'e prOPosed amendment to the Zoning Ord~-~ce to establish 100' setback on the east side of ~oadway BetWeen Santa Clara and the Freeway, and to chan~e Height District II Boundaries. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register em December 5, 196~ and that no written c~mm~nications or objections had Been received. Alex Bowie, ~01 W. $th, attorney representing ~mett C. Rogers spoke briefly in favor of th® proposed amendment. There Being no additional testimon~, the hear~_~ was closed. Tt' Was ~ed by Counc~lm~- EubBax~, seconded By Councilman Schlueter and carried, that Coumcil approve the Planning Cu~aisslon's propose~ amendment to the Zo-~ Ordinance and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an appropriate ordinance. ~.~ HEARING- Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Amendmen~ A.A. ~23 - IPfTINE CO. Application 52B filed By ~he Irvine Company to amend Sectional District Map Ilt~-~ By reclassify~n~ from the A 1 to the M 1 district~ property on the s~uth side of the Newport Freeway Between ~rarner an~ ~arranca. Planning C.---~ssiem Resolution 5712 rec~ended approval of Exhibit A.A. ~2~-A. The Clerk reported that no, ice of the hearing was published in The Register on December 10, 1~, and that no written c~maunications or objections had bees received. There being no resp~se to the Mayor's call for testimony, the hearing was closed. On me%ien of Councilman Habbard, seeended By Coumci~n Gilmore amd carried, Council approved the reclassification and instructed the City Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to w~hiBit 52~-A. ~EARING - Mayor Hall opened the hearing on A.A. ~527 - ROG~ Application 527 filed by Emmett C. Rogers to amend ~ectional District Map 1-5-10 By reclassifying fram the C 1, C 2, and R 1 district to the C 5 district, prOPerty on the east side of Broadway Between Santa Clara and the Santa Ann Freeway. Planning Ceamissien Resolution 571B rec~n~ad approval of E~hiBit A.A. 527 D, which woul~ reclassify to the C 5 an~ P districts. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register on December 5, 1~ and that a letter in opposition had Been received from Mrs. Charles Spicer, 23~ N. Park Boulevard. The letter was ox~ered filed on motion o~ Coumc~ HuBBar~ seconded by Councilman Schlueter an~ carried. Alex Bowie, ~01 W. 8th~ attorney representing the developer, reviewed the prOPosed plans, noting the C ~ district would impose control of plans; stating that the concept was attractive and functional end an asset to the city; and displayed a colored photograph of a scale medel of the proposed development. Charles -~er, 2B~6 N. Park B~ulevard, representing neighboring hc~eowners, protested encronchmant of c~erelal zoning into residential area and the aggravation of an already critical traffic situation. Arthur ~radley, 2~21 N. Park Boulevard, stated that wide selicitation for lessees had Been unsuccessl~al Because of the lack of exit frem the site. Charles Warter, 2320 N. Broadway, and Dr. Ralph Coc~ber, 2Bk5 N. Park Boulevard, also spoke in CITY COUNCIL - 127 - December 21, 196~