Laserfiche WebLink
APPEAL 208 - VA 6~-53 Heart-E was opened on an appeal filed By <br />· AA~SCO CO~. :.. ~illa De Flores W~aeo~ners Association <br /> fron Planning Cc~aissi~n's approval of <br />VA ~-53 to Rirsco Corporation, to construct a' 262-unit apar~ent cc~piex in the <br />A 1 District at 2~1 N. ~ristolf continued fron/June 17th. <br /> <br />Speaking in opposition to granting the variance were Stanley ~afer, attorney <br />representing Villa De Flores Homeowners Association; Ralph Cru~, 2733 No Flower; <br />Bill Van Riper, 25~ Feruwood Drive; and Mary Lou Power, 507 W. Me~ory Lane~ <br />Harol~ Rirsh, representing Hirsco Corporation, and George Weisner~ architect for <br />~irsco Corporation, spoke in favor of granting the variance. The hearing ~was closed. <br /> <br />Council discussed the ~atter at le~h, consider~n~ the traffic problem~ density, <br />~ the proper~y line which wo~ld, he ~d~ feet with ~he apartment units o~er the <br />garages and see~ed to be the ~ain objection of the neighboring property owners. <br /> <br />It was ~oved by C~mucilz~n Carlson, seconded ~y Councilman ~rooks, to uphold the <br />action of the Plamning Cceeaission and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a <br />resolution granting Variance 68-5B sub,eot to conditions~n Find~ of Fact dated <br />May 27, 1~o~, except that Condition 1 be -~nded to include the deletion of the <br />apar~ents over the garages on the easterly side of the property. The ~otion was <br />adopted o~ roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />AB~.e~JC: <br /> <br />Herr:n, Brooks, Carlson, Or:set, Markel, Thur~an, MoM:ch&el <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />At 8:50 P.M., a five ~inute recess was <br />declared. The Council reconveyed at <br />8~55 P.M. with all O~uncil me, hers present. <br /> <br />construct a ~uplex at 701-703 W. Borchard <br /> <br />Hearing was opened on an appea4l filed By <br />Fred Monte fr~a the Zoning Ad~inistrator's <br />denial of Variance Applicatiom 68-5~ to <br />in the R 1 District. <br /> <br />Fred Monte, the appellant, spoke on behalf of the variance and presented a petition <br />cont&ining apprc~i~ately 66 signatures of neighboring residents in favor of the <br />duplex, 15 letters in favor, an~ a letter fron the attorney fronwhonhe purchased <br />the lot. ~n~tion of Council~an~errin, seconded byCou~cil~anGriset~and carried, <br />the ccamunications were ox~lered filed. Also speaking i~favor of the va*lance were <br />Bernar~.Gratavinas, 1~21 $. Part.n; Mrs. Aldo Hope, 1331 S.Par~on; Mrs.~Blairsh, <br />1335 S. Partc~; An~Tiller, 1~02 S. Garnsey; Mrs. Alice Borden, 1330 S. :Patton. <br />Speaking in opposition to the variance were Leonard Carpenter, 131~ S. Ga~nsey; <br />Ralph Porter, 1~06 $. Garnsey. The hearing was closed. <br /> <br />The Plannin~ Director pointed out the Pla~tng Commission's position that this is <br />a long standing, well~aintained single family area and that there are no grounds <br />for changing the density ca this one lot. <br /> <br />After discussion, it wes m~ved By Councilman Griset, seconded hy Councilman Carlson, <br />to ~phol~ the actic~ of the Zo~t~ Administrator and instruct the City Attorney to <br />prepare a resolution de~yin~ Variance 65-5~. On roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES <br />NOES <br />AESE~T <br /> <br />Brooks, Carlson, Griset, Markel, Thur~an, NcMichael <br />Herrin <br />None <br /> <br />C1T~ CO~]~CIL <br /> <br />July 1, 1968 <br /> <br /> <br />