Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dan Bott • • January 15, 2001 <br />City of Santa Ana Paee 4 <br />Cost to do this work is as follows: <br />Bob Rusby 2 Hrs. @ $125 Hr. $250 <br />Env. Planner 4 Ifrs. @ $65 Hr. $260 <br />Graphics 3 Hrs. @ $60 Hr. $180 <br />Total $690 <br />Section 3.0 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br />Land Use and Planning <br />The Land Use and Planning section of the EIR was written to reflect existing City plans and <br />policies that would be impacted by the proposed project. P&D has been advised by City staff <br />that revisions to this section will be based on the findings of the City's design review process <br />when the City's Advanced Planning staff will closely scrutinize the project and make decisions <br />on what plan and policy amendments will be needed to allow for the development of the project. <br />We currently understand that the project will require an amendment to the Midtown Specific <br />Plan, a General Plan amendment and a street abandonment since a portion of the project parking <br />garage is now proposed to be built on a portion of Sycamore Street. Comments on the Land Use <br />Section were also received from Charles View and they will be incorporated in the EIR. Table <br />3.1.1 (Consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies) will also need to be revised based on <br />specific input from the City's Advanced Planning Division and changes required by the revised <br />parking garage plot plan. P&D recently obtained a copy of the City's Circulation Element which <br />will be reviewed and appropriate goals and policies added to this Table. As requested by City <br />staff, P&D will also work with the City on the land use thresholds of significance to be used in <br />this section of the EIR. <br />Cost to do this work is as follows: <br />Bob Rusby 2 Hrs. @ $125 Hr. $250 <br />Env. Planner 8 Hrs. @ $65 Hr. $520 <br />Total $770 <br />Utilities and Service Systems <br />The discussion of the project's impacts on wastewater was written to indicate that a sewer flow <br />study was being prepared to determine whether there was capacity available in the sewers that <br />would serve the project site. This subsection will have to be revised to reflect the results of the <br />sewer flow study. It is now known with certainty that adequate sewer capacity is available to <br />serve the project. Appropriate information in this study will be summarized and added to the <br />EIR. The Level of Significance After Mitigation discussion will also have to be revised to <br />reflect the availability of adequate sewer capacity in the sewer system that would serve the <br />project site. <br />