Laserfiche WebLink
SAN?IAGO CREEK The City Manager requested a policy <br /> determination relative to the "interim <br /> development" of Santiago Creek. He <br />reported that the proposed "interim development" would, as economically as <br />possible, place the Creek in a good position to wit~hstand a similar rainfall <br />situation; that the area involved City easements approximately 80 feet long <br />between the two bridges; that rubble-type material would be introduced to <br />that material already in place to build a rubble bank; that the bank on the <br />side of private property would require additional dirt fill by the property <br />owner in order to bring it up to grade and make it attractive; that contingency <br />funds could be used for.this work; that specifications would have to be developed <br />and contracts let; and that a request should be initiated immediately to the <br />Orange County Flood Control for compensation for cost of the proposed work. <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />At 4:05 P.M., the meeting was recessed <br />for three minutes; it was reconvened at <br />4:12 P.M. <br /> <br />SANTIAGO CREEK Mayor McMichael recognized Mr. Jack <br /> (continued) Dexter, representing Mr. Clarence <br /> Amling, 1114 River Lane, who stated <br />that it was necessary to determine who was affected by the storm damage, River <br />Lane residents, the City of Santa Ana, or the County. <br /> <br />The Mayor recognized Mr. Clarence Amling, 1114 River Lane, who stated that <br />his home was on the north side of the Creek; that his property had been used as <br />a working ground during the storm; and that he had lost about 25 feet of it. <br /> <br />In response to several questions posed by Mr. Amling, the City Manager <br />stated that a concrete wall would be seriously considered for the "ultimate <br />development" of the Creek; that such development was five to seven years <br />away; that the type of rubble material proposed for the "interim development" <br />was similar to that previously introduced and would not make good support <br />for long tree root systems; that, in his opinion, actions taken at Villa Park <br />and Irvine Dams during the storm were prudent; and that Villa Park Dam did <br />save Santa Ana from a flood disaster. <br /> <br />The Mayor recognizedMr. Thomas McLean, 939 Riviera Drive, who stated <br />that the Creek had come along side of ~is pool and had undermined one of his <br />buildings; that in order to use the pool and building again and restore his <br />backyard, a 2:1 ratio of outward compaction and removal of the rubble and <br />car bodies would be necessary. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Griset, the City <br />Manager's recommendations relative to the "interim development" of Santiago <br />Creek were accepted and the Administration was authorized to: (1) develop <br />plans and specifications for award by Council; (2) finance the project from <br />contingency funds; and (3) memorialize the Orange County Flood Control District <br />to accept ownership of the creek bed and assume responsibility for repair work. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />168 April 7, 1969 <br /> <br /> <br />