TELFORDS 1 - 2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

· Overall qualifications of the Prc type of service. · Identification of the technical si placements. · Any unique qualifications and ex provide temporary contract servi · References. e. Quantity and Quality of the Proposer's The City will evaluate the pool of pc for possible consideration. Factors t · The number of the qualified can, · The range of the skills and abilitJ · The depth of the skills and abiliti 3.3 Scoring Method Each criteria of evaluation will be scored on a f; a "0" and a "10" is based on the criteria below: 10% 120% 30% 40% 50% 60% Table 3.3 Scoring Criteria 0% Criterion was not addres., material presented was Bare minimum Criterion was addressed little capability or awaren~ Intermediate score betwc Criterion was addressed some capability. Intermediate score betw6 Criterion was addressed basic capability. 70% Intermediate score betw~ 80% Criterion was addressed indicates some superior f Intermediate score betwE I90% 100% For example, method of assuring capacity a~ score of 15 points. If "Proposer A" addresses th Criterion was addressed indicatincj an excellent or oser and experience and ability to perform this cialties Proposer handles for temporary aerience which distinguish Proposer's ability to ;e persons in the various technical specialties. 'ool of Potential Candidates: ential candidates that a Proposer can present ) be looked at included: lidates in each category and specialty. as of the candidates. ~s of the candidates. ~ctored scale of 0 to 10. The distinction between ed in the proposal or the ~tally without merit. ninimally, but indicated ~ss of area. en 20% and 40%. ~inimally, but indicated sn 40% and 60 % )dequately. Overall, a en 60% and 80% Yell. This response ._.atures. en 80% and 100%, n superior fashion, outstanding capabilit,/. d skill of agency employees has maximum topic well (the definition of an 80% factor), the 15 points would be factored by 80%. Maximum Points 15 November 2001 Score X 80% Net Points 12 13