NAKOMA GROUP 1 -2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 0 • Overall qualifications of the Proposer and experience and ability to perform this type of service. • Identification of the technical specialties Proposer handles for temporary placements. • Any unique qualifications and experience which distinguish Proposer's ability to provide temporary contract service persons in the various technical specialties. • References. e. Quantity and Quality of the Proposer's Pool of Potential Candidates: The City will evaluate the pool of potential candidates that a Proposer can present for possible consideration. Factors to be looked at included: • The number of the qualified candidates in each category and specialty. • The range of the skills and abilities of the candidates. • The depth of the skills and abilities of the candidates. 3.3 Scoring Method Each criteria of evaluation will be scored on a factored scale of 0 to 10. The distinction between a "0" and a "10" is based on the criteria below: Table 3.3 Scoring Criteria 0% Criterion was not addressed in the proposal or the material presented was totally without merit. 10% Bare minimum 20% Criterion was addressed minimally, but indicated little capability or awareness of area. 30% Intermediate score between 20% and 40 %. 40% Criterion was addressed minimally, but indicated some capability. 50% Intermediate score between 40% and 60 % 60% Criterion was addressed adequately. Overall, a basic capability. 70% Intermediate score between 60% and 80% 80% Criterion was addressed well. This response indicates some superior features. 90% Intermediate score between 80% and 100 %. 100% Criterion was addressed in superior fashion, indicating an excellent or outstanding capability. For example, method of assuring capacity and skill of agency employees has maximum score of 15 points. If "Proposer A" addresses the topic well (the definition of an 80% factor), the 15 points would be factored by 80 %. Maximum Points Score 15 X 80% Net Points 12 November 2001 13