My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC. - 2003
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
INACTIVE CONTRACTS (Originals Destroyed)
>
B (INACTIVE)
>
BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC. - 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2015 10:52:01 AM
Creation date
2/17/2004 2:34:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
Bentley Systems Incorporated
Contract #
A-2003-218
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
10/6/2003
Expiration Date
11/30/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) <br />BENTLEY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED <br />CMAS NO. 3-01-70-1198B <br />FEDERAL DEBARMENT <br />When federal funds are being expended, the ordering <br />agency is required to obtain (retain in file) a signed <br />"Federal Debarment" certification from the Contractor <br />before the purchase order is issued. <br />This certification is required by the regulations <br />implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and <br />Suspension, 29 CFR Part 98, Section 98.510, <br />Participants; responsibilities. The regulations were <br />published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988 Federal <br />Register (pages 19160- 192111. <br />ORDER LIMITS <br />The maximum amount of each transaction placed <br />under the award contract is $500,000.00. <br />Splitting orders to avoid any monetary limitations is <br />prohibited. <br />Do not circumvent normal procurement methods by <br />splitting purchases into a series of delegated purchase <br />orders (SAM 3572). <br />Splitting a project into small projects to avoid either <br />fiscal or procedural controls is prohibited (SAM <br />4819.34). <br />MINIMUM ORDER LIMITATION <br />There is no minimum dollar value limitation on orders <br />placed under this contract. <br />MULTIPLE CONTRACTS ON STD. 65 ORDER FORM <br />Agencies may include multiple contracts from the <br />same supplier on a single Std. 65 Contract /Delegation <br />Purchase Order. Agencies wishing to create a single <br />purchase order using multiple CMAS contract numbers <br />must adhere to the following guidelines, without <br />exception. <br />1 . All contracts must be for the same CMAS supplier <br />2. The order must go to one supplier location. <br />3. Place the word "CMAS" in the space usually <br />reserved for the contract number. On Std. 65s, <br />this is at the top of the form. The word "CMAS" <br />signifies that the order contains items from multiple <br />CMAS contracts. <br />4. The purchasing agency may only use one (1) bill <br />code. <br />Updated 9/4101 <br />5. For each individual contract (as differentiated by <br />alpha suffix), the agency must identify and group <br />together the contract number with line items and <br />subtotal per contract number (do not include tax in <br />the subtotal), AND sequentially identify each <br />individual contract as Sub #1, Sub 1"2, Sub #3, etc. <br />This facilitates accurate billing by the Procurement <br />Division. <br />6. The total of all items on the purchase order must <br />not exceed the order limit identified in the CMAS <br />contract. <br />7. Do not combine items from both commodity and <br />information technology contracts. Commodity <br />contracts begin with the number 4 and information <br />technology contracts begin with the number 3. <br />The order limits are different for these types of <br />contracts. <br />MAINTENANCE TAX <br />The Board of Equalization has ruled that in accordance <br />with Section 1655 of the Sales and Use Tax <br />Regulations of the Business Taxes Law Guide, that <br />whenever optional maintenance contracts include <br />consumable supplies, such supplies are subject to <br />sales tax. <br />Generally, the State has the option of entering into <br />contracts which provide for only maintenance services <br />(i.e. the furnishing of labor and parts necessary to <br />maintain equipment) or contracts which provide for <br />both maintenance services and consumable supply <br />items (i.e. toner, developer, and staples, for example). <br />When the State has the first choice available above, <br />the charges for the provision of maintenance services <br />are not taxable. However, when both maintenance <br />services and consumable supplies are provided (second <br />choice abovel, the provision of the consumable <br />supplies is considered a taxable sale of tangible <br />personal property. <br />Therefore, State agencies awarding optional <br />maintenance contracts are responsible for paying the <br />applicable sales tax on the consumable supplies <br />utilized during the performance period of the <br />maintenance contract. <br />The contractor will be required to itemize the <br />consumables being taxed for state accounting <br />purposes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.