My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32B - 122 & 124 E. DYER ROAD
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
03/15/2004
>
32B - 122 & 124 E. DYER ROAD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:03:04 PM
Creation date
3/15/2004 3:12:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32B
Date
3/15/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />tltTentative Parcel Map No. 2004-01 <br />ebruary 25, 2004 <br />J?age 2 of 2 <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />The design and improvements of the proposed project will not cause <br />substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably <br />injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. <br /> <br />In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA) , the project is exempt from further review. The <br />project site is located in an urbanized area. There are no <br />known fish or wildlife populations, wetlands or unusual flora <br />or fauna on or around the proj ect site. Therefore, the <br />proposed subdivision will not cause any substantial <br />environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure <br />fish and wildlife or their habitat. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />The design or improvements of the proposed project will not cause <br />serious public health problems. <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision is not anticipated to have any <br />detrimental effects upon the general public. Each property <br />will meet the City's requirements. pertaining to sewer, watér <br />utilities and infrastructure improvements as conditioned in <br />Development Project Review No. 2003-43. <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />The design or improvements of the proposed project will not <br />conflict with easements necessary for public access through or use <br />of the property within the proposed project. <br /> <br />The subdivision has been designed to comply with the adopted <br />street plan for Dyer Road and will not conflict with easements <br />necessary for public access, since public access is provided <br />from Dyer Road. Reciprocal access agreements will be recorded <br />to ensure perpetual access internally between the two <br />integrated parcels. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />328-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.