Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,F. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the <br />site or area, including through the alteration of the <br />course of stream or river, or substantially increase the <br />rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would <br />result in flooding on or off-site? <br />Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the <br />capacity of .sisting or 'planned stOCD water drainage <br />systems or provide substantial additional sources of <br />polluted run-off? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The SD-60 project area is currently improved with drainage <br />facilities. The proposed amendment to SD-GO would incorporate <br />existing buildings into the SD-GO project area. Approval of the <br />proposed amendment to SD-GO would not directly alter existing <br />drainage patterns or directly increase existing rates of surface <br />water runoff. ' <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Place housing within a lOa-year floodplain, as mapped on a <br />federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Plood Insurance Rate Map <br />or other flood hazard delineation map? <br />Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would <br />impede or redirect flood flows? <br />Place housing within a lOa-year floodplain, as mapped on a <br />federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Plood Insurance Rate Hap <br />or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />Nó Impact <br /> <br />.According to Flood Rat,e Insurance Map OG059Co'038F the SD-60 <br />project area is not situated within a 100-year flood Zone. <br />Therefore, approval of the proposed amendment to SD-60 would not <br />be subject to 100-year flood risks. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />VII. LAN]) USB/PLANNING <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD-GO would not physically <br />divide any established communities or neighborhoods, in that SD- <br />60 is currently void of residential land uses. <br /> <br />s. <br /> <br />Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />11 <br />19D;.15 <br />