My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-1972
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1972
>
05-15-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:23 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:51:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/15/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPEAL #304 <br />VA 72-32 - CURCI-TURNER COMPANY - (Continued) <br /> <br />Mrs~ Diane Jungkman, 601 Columbine, stated that she is aware of the problem; <br />that she often drives down Bristol Street and makes a left turn onto Central, and <br />that it is extremely hazardous. <br /> <br />Mr. Vern Mansur, 2701 South Poplar, stated that the back of his property abuts <br />Parcel Z, and his main concern is the high rise, which would be detrimental to <br />his property. <br /> <br />Mr. John L. Curci, 717 Lido Court Drive, Newport Beach, stated that some of <br />the concerns stated will be brought out at the time there is a proposal on the <br />parcels; that this variance request is only to divide the parcel. <br /> <br />In response to Councilman Evans' question, the Planning Director stated that a <br />3-story building is permitted in the C 4 zone; however, that the building on Parcel <br />2- is shown on plot plans as approximately 150' removed from the west property <br />line~ <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents: and the Mayor closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Villa, to uphold the <br />decision of the Planning Commission and instruct the City Attorney to prepare <br />a resolution approving Variance Application 7Z-JZ, subject to conditions of <br />approval contained in the Commission report, with the additional condition that <br />no building over one story will be erected on Parcels Z and 3 closer than 100 <br />feet to the westerly boundary, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Patterson, Villa, Herrin, Griset, Yamamoto, Markel <br />Evans <br />None <br /> <br />WAt{NF_~AVENUE-SOUTH The Director of Planning briefly <br />COMMUNITY PLAN STUDY reviewed the Planning Staff r.eport. <br /> He stated that the Planning Cornrnission <br />had continued this matter to their May 2Z agenda, awaiting the report of the <br />special cornrnittee; that the area already developed or committed between <br />Bristol and Main and Warner and Sunflower will have an average density of 1Z,, 8; <br />that in the area from Bristol to Fairview the average density of existing and <br />committed developments is 16~, 5; that Staff Plan A, which is the one recommended <br />to Council, would result in a net density of 13o 1 dwelling units per acre. <br /> <br />Mr. John R. Schilling, Chairman of the Joint Committee on Warner South, stated <br />that the basic question asked of the committee was how will the City be sure that <br />public facilities are available when the area is built out to capacity; that the only <br />way to assure this is to curb the high density development in the area; that the <br />committee endorses Plan A recommendation of Staff; that once this plan is <br />established, developers could then be permitted to come forward with residential <br />developments for this area consistent with density designations of Plan A; that <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -210- May 15, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.