10-01-1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY After considering the BUDGET 1973-74 report of the Assistant City Manager dated September 27, 1973, incorporating the proposed budget for the Community Redevelop- ment Agency for 1973-1974, Council appropriated the funds needed for the budget on motion of Councilman Griset, seconded by Councilman Ward, and carried on a 4 2 Vote with Council- men Markel and Evans dissenting. (CA 82.4) RECESS Councilmen present. At 3:45 P.M., a recess was declared. The meeting reconvened at 3:58 P.M. with the same SOLICITATION APPLICATION The Clerk stated that PRIDE she had received a telephone call from representatives from Pride Equals Respectability and Equality, Inc. that morning requesting that their organization be given permission to solicit funds pending action on their application. The applica- tion had been considered by Council on September 17, 1973, and had been continued to October 1, 1973, contingent upon receipt of additional information from the applicant. The Clerk stated that she had not received the information prior to the deadline for the October 1 Agenda, but that she was informed that the information was in the hands of the Police Department. The City Manager stated that he had been informed that the Police Department needed additional time to process the information that had been received from the applicant. After discussion, Councilman Griset's motion to continue consideration of the application to October 15, 1973, was seconded by Councilman Markel and unanimously carried on a 6 - 0 vote. Prior to voting, Councilman Ward stated that he would expect to see a balance sheet of Pride's operation in the City of Santa Aha when he considered the application on October 15. (CA 91) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Markel referred to a report he had received from the City Attorney's Office relating to the use of property at 825 N. Ross, and stated that he believed the property was not suitable for use as a professional office. Vice Mayor Evans stated that he understood the matter was still in the meet and confer stages, and that discussion of the matter should probably be deferred until it was before Council at a subsequent meeting. (CA 87) Councilman Markel stated that he had also received from the City Attorney's Office a summary of all of the good things that office had accomplished during the year; that he was satisfied that it was good to know these things, but it was not in order to spend the money necessary to prepare such a summary. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 356 OCTOBER 1, 1973