12-16-1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PUBLIC HEARING WARD BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT posed changes to the Ward boundaries Mayor Patterson declared that this was the time and place for the public hearing to consider pro- of the City. Councilman Markel suggested that the small area in Ward 1 bounded by Chestnut, Lyon, McFadden and the City limits should logically be in Ward No. 6. There were no other persons who wished to speak, either for or against the Ward boundary changes, which consisted of a minor adjustment of the Ward boundary line of Washington Street between Ward 3 and Ward 5, so that a County precinct boundary would not be split by a Ward boundary, in accordance with the Santa Ana Charter, and the Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was placed on first reading on the unanimously approved motion of Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto: ORDINANCE NS-1242 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CHANGING AND ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE WARDS OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. Staff was directed, at the time of the next realignment of boundaries, to realign them so that they look contiguous, and to eliminate "fingers" and islands where possible, on the unanimously approved motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto. (CA 108) PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Patterson announced ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 237 that this was the time (QUIGLEY LANE) and place for the public hearing of protests or objections to the proposed construction of certain street improvements together with appurtenances and all matters con- tained in Resolution of Intention No. 74-168, relating to Assessment District No. 237 (Quigley Lane). He stated further that this is the time and place for the hear- ing to determine whether or not said proceedings should proceed without the provisions of Division 4 of the Streets and High- ways Code of the State of California. The Clerk of the Council announced that the Resolution of Inten- tion was regularly published and due notice of the hearing and of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention was duly made and given in the manner and form as prescribed by law, and that the following affidavits are on file in her office: a. Affidavit of Publication; b. Certificate of Posting Streets; c. Certificate of Mailing Notices; d. Certificate of Piling Boundary Map. Mayor Patterson announced that it was a combined hearing, and that it was also the time for presentation and consideration of the construction bids previously received for Assessment Dis- trict No. 237. The City Engineer reported to the Council that seven bids had been received; that the Iow bidder was City Construction Company, 17840 E. Verness, Covina, California, and he recommended that the bid be awarded to City Construction Company, on the basis of lowest responsible and best bidder. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 471 DECEMBER 16, 1974