Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AGREEMENT 1-2354 <br />Exhibit A <br /> <br />the Transit Planning and Operations Committee (TPOC), the various design options regarding <br />size and aesthetics for the permanentfeatures. The CONSULTANT will also be prepared to be <br />available and to provide documents, renderings, models, etc. as required for presentations to the <br />cities, at community meetings, and other forums as required by the PubJic Involvement Program. <br /> <br />Aerial Structures: The CenterLine Project is expected to be primarily an aerial structure. The <br />CONSULT ANT will evaluate several possible design options for the aerial structure'and support <br />columns. These options will confonn to the CaJifornia seismic requirements. The options will be <br />developed in suĊ’cient detail in plan, elevation, and section views so that they may be evaluated <br />and preliminary cost estimates prepared. The options will then be ranked for cost, design <br />attractiveness, and constmctability, with The AUTHORITY selecting a preferred design, Once <br />selected, preliminary engineering will be perfom1ed for all aerial sections. Plans will include <br />structure cross-section(s); plans and profiles including abutment locations, pier locations, and <br />under-structure clearances; and preliminary abutment, pier, and foundation structural designs. <br />Coordination with trackwork will also be included, especially for the possibility of using a thirf! <br />rail electrification system. <br /> <br />Retaining Walls: There are several locations where conceptual engineering indicates retaining <br />walls will be needed. The CONSULTANT will evaluate several possible design options for <br />standard retaining walls. The options will be developed in sufficient detail in plan, elevation, and <br />section views to be evaluated and to prepare preliminary cost estimates. These retaining wall <br />options will be ranked in tenns of cost, design attractiveness, and constmctability, with The <br />AUTHORITY selecting a preferred design. Once selected, standard plans for retaining walls will <br />be prepared for use in final design. <br /> <br />Catenary Stmctures: The CONSULTANT will study several configurations of catenary poles to <br />detennine the optimal type, size, spacing and cost. They will be presented in sufficient detail <br />including brackets and wiring, so that design appeal can be assessed for in street nmning at <br />speeds of 35 rnph or below, street running where speeds will be between 36 and 45 mph, within <br />an off-street right-of-way (where speeds will be up to 55 mph), and for the possibility of <br />inclusion on aerial stmcture. The possible relationship between the catenary poles and existing <br />street lighting and traffic signal poles in street and mall mnning areas will be assessed and <br />rendered. The various design options will be ranked by initial cost, design attractiveness, <br />compatibility with existing poles, life-cycle costs, and maintainability. More than one catenary <br />pole design may be selected by The AUTHORITY. Once selected, standard drawings will be , <br />prepared for use in further systems and civil engineering work. While foundations for catenary <br />poles are typically drilled caissons, the CONSULTANT will identify other foundation designs in. <br />areas where soil conditions, aerial section, or adjacent structures require them, <br /> <br />Existing Stmctures: The CONSULTANT will prepare an engineering evaluation of all bridge <br />structures, culverts, etc" which The CenterLine Project will cross over or under. A Bridge <br />Evaluation Report will be prepared which recommends any repair or retrofitting needed to allow <br />the bridge to carry the project loads, meet the latest seismic requirements, or handle stray <br />electrical currents. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />.;~..::::=---" _.,,'~: <br /> <br />,",,' <br />-- <br /> <br />6'- <br /> <br />