|
The seven recommendations submitted to Council by letter dated August 6,
<br />1979, from Councilman Serrato, for consideration by Council as possible
<br />additions to the proposed ordinance~ were acted upon as follows:
<br />
<br />The MDTIONmade by Bricken, seconded by Ward, to not include Item 1, that
<br />the Planning Commission should discourage projects---~or conversion when
<br />the City's vacancy rate falls below 3.0 percent, FAILED on the following
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />AYES: BRICKEN, GRISET~ WARD
<br />NOES: LUXEMBOURGER, MARKEL, SERRATO, yAMAMOTO
<br />
<br />The MOTION made by Serrato, seconded by Yamamoto, to include Item 1,
<br />stated above, FAILED on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />
<br />SERRATO, YAMAMOTO
<br />BRICKF~N, GRISET, L~OURGER, MARKEL, WARD
<br />
<br />The MOTION made by Bricken to include Item 2 was not seconded.
<br />
<br />MOTION was made by Luxembourger, seconded by Yamamoto, to include Item 2,
<br />that the ordinance should require a structural pest control report within
<br />ninety days or less prior to occupancy.
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />
<br />BRICKEN, GRISET~ L~OURGER~ SERRATO~ YAMAMOTO
<br />MARKBL, WARD
<br />
<br />MOTION was made by Serrato, seconded by Bricken, to include Item 3, that
<br />the ordinance shall require the subdivider to upgrade the project's water
<br />delivery system if the current system is in non-compliance with the City's
<br />current fire flow requirements~ with waiver provision.
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />
<br />BRICKEN, GRISET, LUXE~BOURGER, MARl(EL, SERRATO, WARD, YAMAMOTO
<br />NONE
<br />
<br />The MOTION made by Serrato, seconded by Luxembourger, to include Item 4,
<br />that the age of each occupant be included in Tenant Identification, Divi-
<br />sion 4, Section 34-348, FAILED on the following vote:
<br />
<br /> AYES: SERRATO
<br /> NOES: BRICKEN, GRISET, LUXE~BOURGER, MARKEL, WARD, YAMAMOTO
<br />
<br />The NDTION mad~ by Serrato, seconded by Luxembourger, to include Item 5,
<br />that the words "other th~n dependent children,' be deleted from Division 4,
<br />Section 34-348, and that dependent children be included, FAILED on the follow-
<br />ing vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />
<br />LUXtB~OURGER, SERRATO
<br />BRtCKEN, GRISET, MARK~L, WARD, YAMAMOTO
<br />
<br />The MOTION by Serrato to include Item 6, that the Tenant Assistance Plan
<br />shall be provided by the subdivider of said apartment to each.tenant
<br />30 days prior to filing a tentative map for conversion (Division 4), was
<br />not seconded.
<br />
<br />MOTION was made by Bricken, seconded by Luxembourger, to include Item 7,
<br />that the subdivider shall allow for an extension of termination to permit
<br />a tenant, including dependents, to con~lete a school semester or quarter
<br />as the case may be (Division 4).
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />
<br />BRICI~N, GRISET, LUXttMBOURGER, SERRATO, WARD, YAMAMOTO
<br />MARKEL
<br />
<br />MOTION was made by Ward, seconded by Bricken, that conversion applicants
<br />be required to provide evidence of intent to mmintain ten percent of units
<br />for non-owner occupancy.
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />NOES:
<br />
<br />BRICKEN, LUXtB~OURGER, SERRATO, WARD
<br />GRISBT, MARK~L, YAMAMOTO
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
<br />
<br />292
<br />
<br />AUGUST 20, 1979
<br />
<br />
<br />
|