My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/15/1983
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY(formerly Community Redevelopment Agency)
>
COMMUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1973-1999
>
1983
>
02/15/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:15:12 PM
Creation date
3/3/2005 11:30:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/15/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In response to another question raised by Mr. Acosta, the <br />Community Development Director responded that the neigh- <br />borhood had a primary concern that the park maintain its <br />current character for family use. The neighborhood was <br />concerned that the seniors would come in and change the <br />character of the park. <br /> <br />After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Mr. Griset, <br />seconded by Mrs. McGuigan and carried by a 5:1 vote (Mr. <br />Markel casting the "NO" vote) to grant Brichpark Associates <br />a three-month exclusive right to negotiate for the <br />development of the A-I site subject to the payment of <br />$15,000 to cover one-half of the Agency cost of appraisal <br />and economic analysis. <br /> <br />DEVELOPER SELECTION FOR THE A-5 DEVELOPMENT SITE <br /> <br />The Community Development Director stated that in mid 1982, <br />the Redevelopment Agency authorized staff to solicit <br />developer qualifications for the A-5 development site. <br />Three companies out of nearly 300 proposals that were sent <br />out responded. They are: The San Clemente Corporation, <br />Urbatec and the Santa Anita Development Corporation. The <br />Santa Anita Development Corporation withdrew from consid- <br />eration before the Development Team review was scheduled. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />On November 10,1982, the Development Team met to consider <br />and rank the two proposals based on the available <br />information supplied by the applicants. The Urbatec <br />proposal received a total of 397 out of a possible of 600 <br />points and the San Clemente Development Group received a <br />score of 233 out of a possible 600 points. The Urbatec <br />proposal exceeded the San Clemente proposal in every <br />category. <br /> <br />Mr. John MacLaurin, President of Urbatec, stated that this <br />will be a project that the City will be proud of. <br /> <br />Mr. Randy Jones of Herbert, <br />several planning details. <br /> <br />Nadel <br /> <br />& Partners explained <br /> <br />Mr. Luxembourger requested that minutes <br />meetings to be held with the businessmen. <br /> <br />be taken at the <br /> <br />In response to a question raised by Mr. Acosta, the <br />Community Development Director responded that the Salvation <br />Army facility was not included in this particular site. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The following persons spoke in favor of this project: <br /> <br />Zika Djokovich, 211 N. Main Street <br />Bruce R. McLean, 201 N. Main Street <br />LaDale Dunbar, 824 N. Olive <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.