My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - 2721 HOTEL TERRACE DRIVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
01/17/2006
>
75A - 2721 HOTEL TERRACE DRIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:49:07 PM
Creation date
1/11/2006 9:32:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
1/17/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Lonft-Term Stay Hotel <br /> <br />Drafi Parkinft Study <br /> <br />4.2.2 ITE Parking Generation Parking Demand <br /> <br />The ITE Parking Generation contains parking data for several different types of hotels uses. The <br />hotel uses are divided into three different categories, an All Suites Hotel, a Business Hotel and a <br />Resort Hotel. However, the descriptions of these different hotels do not closely resemble the <br />proposed ESA hotel. Therefore, the parking rates for these hotel land uses were not, but the <br />parking rate for the general Hotel category was used. The average parking rate listed in the ITE <br />Parking Generation was 0.91 parking spaces per room, which was based on data collected at 14 <br />hotels throughout the United States. Therefore, the required parking spaces for the proposed <br />ESA hotel will be 168 parking spaces. <br /> <br />4.2.3 Telephone Survey Parking Demand <br /> <br />P&D contacted the six local jurisdictions identified in Section 2.2.3 to determine how other <br />jurisdictions would determine the minimum parking requirements for a long-term stay hotel. In <br />general, each jurisdiction calculated the minimum parking requirements based on each <br />jurisdiction's respective parking rates as listed in the Municipal Code or Zoning Code. However, <br />the Cities of Irvine and Y orba Linda do not have any established parking rates for hotels. These <br />Cities requires an independent transportation consultant to conduct a parking study to establish <br />the minimum parking requirements. Table 4.2-2 shows the parking rates per hotel variable. As <br />shown in Table 4.2-2, each jurisdiction has a different methodology for calculating the minimum <br />parking requirements. <br /> <br />TABLE 4.2-2 <br />PARKING RATES-ASSORTED CITIES <br /> <br /> Parkin [J Rates <br />City Per 10 Per 1,000 SF of Manager's Per Per Transport <br />Per Room Conference <br /> Rooms Room Unit Employee Vehicle <br />Santa Ana 1.0 1.0 N/A 2.0 N/A N/A <br />Anaheim 0.8 N/A 8 N/A 0.25 N/A <br />Costa MesaL1J 2.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A <br />Huntington Beach I.I N/A N/A 2.0 N/A 1.0, minimum 2 <br />Irvine Requires Parking Study <br />Newport Beach 0.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A <br />Y orba Linda Requires Parking Study <br />. . <br /> <br />Sources: Cities of Anaheim, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Newport Beach and Y orba Linda (2005). <br />[1] The City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code states that the parking requirements for hotels with cooking facilities <br />shall be governed by the residential parking standards. The proposed hotel rooms most closely resemble a <br />bachelor's residential unit. Therefore, the parking requirements are 1.5 parking spaces per unit and 0.5 guest <br />parking spaces per unit. <br /> <br />Table 4.2-3 shows the parking requirements for each jurisdiction based the each jurisdiction's <br />Municipal Code or Zoning Code. As shown in Table 4.2-3, the parking requirement varied from <br />a low of 92 parking spaces for the City of Newport Beach to a high of368 parking spaces for the <br />City of Costa Mesa. The parking requirements for the City of Costa Mesa were high because the <br />City of Costa Mesa considered hotels with cooking facilities to be residential units. Therefore, <br />the parking rate of2.0 parking spaces per bachelor residential unit was used. <br /> <br />TCB <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />75A-51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.