My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - TTM 2005-11, 2000 E FIRST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
05/01/2006
>
32A - TTM 2005-11, 2000 E FIRST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:46:57 PM
Creation date
4/26/2006 11:54:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32A
Date
5/1/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />c. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geological <br />feature? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's Updated General Plan Land Use Element <br />EIR, the project site does not contain any unique geologic <br />features. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project <br />would not result in adverse impacts to any unique geologic <br />feature. <br /> <br />D. In the project located on strata or soil that is unstable <br />or that would become unstable as a result of the project <br />and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral <br />spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br /> <br />Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated <br /> <br />According to the Updated General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the <br />project site contains Mocho Loam Soils that have low <br />shrink/swell potential, high potential for corrosion of uncoated <br />steel and low potential for corrosion of concrete. Based on the <br />soil conditions on the project site the proposed project would <br />be geotechnically feasible. Through the City's Development <br />review process, the proposed project would be required to <br />prepare a site-specific geotechnical to address the geologic <br />conditions on the project site, building loads of the project <br />and the identification of design recommendations to ensure the <br />long-term geotechnically stability of the proposed project. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measure <br /> <br />· Prior to issuance of grading permits the proj ect developer <br />shall prepare and submit for approval a geotechnical report <br />that addresses seismic constraints, soil stability and <br />provides design recommendation to insure the geotechnical <br />stability of the project site. <br /> <br />E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of <br />wastewater is the soil capable of supporting the use of <br />septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The project site is located within urban setting where sewer <br />service is available. The proposed project would not require <br />septic tanks or alternative disposal systems. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />3~5~8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.