|
<br />..
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />. ~.~,~-, ':;;'i)_~:~,,~t:"
<br />a'~. ":,,,jj~;;.c,
<br />;1_..~} -. ._. k\l~,"_,'~~;~~~(:J-:~~-'o ~,-
<br />_ _, .~, -'~,.F--:+ 'j-'
<br />,\i;tAT;-'-::i;~<;;::;,-_,-;~.,.
<br />/(J,(.\uation lSt,~ ~;_;",' - t;f
<br />Z.~-'~ ~1(t.:~~~-~:;__-;~'-.:_~ fi}?--:,:,'
<br />"-"-/;, ::-:---v _':~-)3,._~-";;,_~: :_Y;.-.;;~\_- _ ,'Ni>;','-', <~"'
<br />
<br />,- ,..,;'; ,.L~,~~L~~~,,!:;
<br />~;; ~ ta~kE., Monthly Projeot Status Repohs'& Meetings
<br />- .'-''':-. _ .,.--.'.'_.':,:-:,,::' ,,:--,' -', J ,.1 ----~:-"~:<P/>!r--::-':-,:;;t-<:'
<br />Submit writter; Mo'ndlly.Project;Stat~s Rep:5hs to the City's Project Engineer. The reports are to include
<br />progress' to dare and an!icipated chall~nges, aild will be used as a measure of work complered. Harris welcomes
<br />the accountabiliry afforded by this planning I communication tool and so do Ciry staff who musr keep several
<br />departments and Ciry Council members up ro date on the latest project status. The written Monthly Project Status
<br />Reports will be submitted at least four working days prior ro the monthly progress meeting with Ciry staff.
<br />
<br />
<br />Task F: QA I QC Review
<br />
<br />Prior ro the submittal of the conceptual alignment exhibit and the first formal PS&E submittal for Ciry review,
<br />a thorough review of the said documents will be performed, by an independent experienced project manager, to
<br />confirm their quality, clarity, constructability and that all of the projects intents are being met. The review process
<br />shall include a second thorough "back check" review of all recommended corrections. All project reports (such as
<br />the Hydrology & Hydraulics Report and geotechnical investigation Report), correspondence, memos, meeting
<br />minutes, and significant project direction provided by Ciry staff will be organized, filed and reviewed as part of
<br />the QNQC process. Harris & Associates will also use internal Qualiry Control Plan, QNQC plan checklists and
<br />"Project Managers Manual" guidelines to further ensure that when the Ciry finally sees the delivered documents
<br />they will be right and complete from the start. It will also be very important that an internal review is performed of
<br />all sub-consultant submittals (repofts, plans, specifications & estimates) so that they are confirmed to be complete,
<br />match the intended project scope and latest civil plan layouts and conform to City provided direction and
<br />requirements.
<br />
<br />Task G: Construction Document Processing - City Review
<br />
<br />. Upon completion of the concept design phase Harris will refine the project plans, specifications and cost
<br />estimate, the will submit RFP required number of documents of each deliverable to the City; including
<br />reduced copies and disks, at the 60% "redline feedback" stage, and 90% and HiO% completion levels for
<br />review and comment.
<br />
<br />. Review results of City staff's review (a coordinated multi-department review) and discuss as necessary.
<br />
<br />. Make agreed on revisions and corrections to the plans, specifications and cost estimate after each review and
<br />resubmit to City.
<br />
<br />. Coordinate with aCTA for parallel review and approval of all impacts to their existing bus stops and proposed
<br />bus bays.
<br />
<br />. Upon final completion, acceptance and approval of the plans, specifications and estimate by the City, provide
<br />the Ciry with a project file including the following information:
<br />- Utility coordination logs, data and correspondence
<br />- Original plans (ink on double-matte mylar)
<br />- Camera ready original specifications
<br />- CD of specifications, estimate and plans. Microstation files will be in a format compatible with City's
<br />system.
<br />
<br />R I Harris & Associates.
<br />
<br />Bristol Corridor Widening - Phase I
<br />Page-16-
<br />
|