My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GORDON & WILLIAMS, INC. 1 - 2002
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
>
GORDON & WILLIAMS, INC. 1 - 2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 2:54:05 PM
Creation date
1/31/2007 10:07:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
Gordon & Williams, Inc.
Contract #
A-2002-144A
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
7/15/2002
Expiration Date
9/1/2007
Insurance Exp Date
6/27/2008
Destruction Year
2012
Notes
TERM SLIP 08/22/07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Does the Team have the3~OUrces (i.e., staff, physical facilities, financldf depth) needed to undertake <br />this project? <br />• Does the Team have a proven ability to implement projects quickly and cost-effectively? <br />• Does the Team have established, clear lines of responsibility within their organization, as well as <br />open lines of communication with their clients and the community they serve? <br />• Is the Team associated with projects known to be of exceptional quality and reputation? <br />• Does the Team have a demonstrated history of cost control on past projects? <br />• Do the Team and/or individuals have a history of working together as a Team? <br />• Does the Team have a demonstrated history of quality control on past projects? <br />• Are the Team's individual participants and their office located in the same metropolitan area? <br />• Does the Team have a record of on-schedule delivery? <br />The important threshold issues for the final phase of the selection process are: <br />- Team and client compatibility <br />- Experience <br />- The right blend of design creativity, attention to detail and functional practicality <br />- Reputation for reliability and well-managed projects <br />- Cost Control <br />The above threshold issues will be used by the panel in evaluating submittals, developing a short list, <br />evaluating finalist presentations, and awarding a contract <br />4. Selection of Finalists <br />The panel will select finalists for oral presentations if necessary. Notice of final selection or <br />"short list" will be mailed to all candidates on or about May 24, 2002. <br />,. 5. Presentations by Finalists/Fee Proposal <br />Following selection of the finalists with the "apparent best" qualifications, presentations may <br />be scheduled. The purpose of the presentation is to enable the finalists to provide a more <br />in-depth demonstration of qualifications and capacity for this project <br />A sealed fee cost proposal in a separate envelope must be submitted by the Team. The <br />specific format for this submittal is included as Attachment "B". Upon selection of the most <br />qualified finalist, the sealed fee proposal will be opened and negotiations will commence to <br />determine the broad outlines of a working relationship (Scope of Work), including financial <br />matters. If an Agreement cannot be reached, negotiations will be terminated and the next <br />highest ranked finalist will be invited to negotiate and their sealed fee proposal will be <br />opened. The conclusion of these interviews and negotiations will result in the selected Team <br />entering into an Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. All other sealed fee proposals will be <br />returned (unopened) to remaining finalists. <br />At the conclusion of these interviews; a decisiop by the panel will be forwarded to the Ci[y of <br />Santa Ana City Council for approval of contracts. <br />S of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.