My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS 7a
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
>
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2024 3:52:58 PM
Creation date
9/22/2008 2:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS
Contract #
A-2008-141
Agency
PLANNING & BUILDING
Council Approval Date
6/2/2008
Expiration Date
6/30/2009
Insurance Exp Date
5/1/2009
Destruction Year
2018
Notes
Amends A-2007-169 Amended by A-2008-141-001, -002, -03
Document Relationships
URS CORPORATION 7 (2)
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS 7b
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS 7c
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
URS CORPORATION AMERICAS 7d
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
methodologies and assumptions. This facilitates a clear <br />understanding of the City's goals and approach to the <br />project by all key staff working on the contract. Doing <br />so reduces the time necessary to bring the URS team <br />up to speed on the contract, thus freeing the time of <br />the URS Project Manager to focus on the City's needs. <br />Further, the PMP enhances our ability to involve a <br />larger group of staff in the contract, thereby ensuring <br />that all assignments are staffed with the best resources <br />of the team. The graphic illustrates visually our Task <br />Order ("TO") Management process. <br />The URS team's reputation for outstanding <br />achievements in environmental document approval is <br />largely due to our strong belief that every element of <br />TasVAUGEMENT PROCESS <br />TM LM1y b.un TO <br />1 TM Cp MenAfies a poRb need <br />end appropbb sdedub <br />17, <br />TM ups Pm�etl wneper i]enufin appaq'ale <br />TO MangeraM sWmnaMlanbh bMam <br />Th Prgq M.nayar arM abo acne Y Me TO <br />Manager MrmNbbW ft.n *on aoarJpa <br />m <br />PICIL NenaTgOnTaOnMadn-ageWr` <br />dMO—x <br />M. <br />w <br />4 <br />M.Yh db dmgnebd <br />. <br />AAK <br />p <br />raonam nws to aoni <br />TM.URSft,M.1TOM.npr <br />d—op—PbWbdeaaleTplromOroMEPmb <br />and s. <br />.Waalana.roraeIrbe.na.mnaAlebd„toI <br />91�M�bLwp1rYno <br />. <br />oTO, URS Tm <br />TO Mene aM City soMZ <br />ga.11lyes h <br />O roURS PmaM8kOeuyp* <br />bam mad <br />rosubbbe Cky <br />the project should be carefully planned and designed for maximum flexibility. Scheduling that allows for increased <br />overlap of concurrent activities (e.g., multiple document mangers and permitting specialists) can accelerate typical <br />project development timeframes and allows URS to service multiple City task orders. Because schedule delays are one <br />of the most significant contributing factors to budget overruns as well, it is imperative that the needed resources are <br />available, and that a project schedule is established based on realistic <br />importance <br />expectations; and then adhered to throughout a project's development stages. recognize <br />frsn . <br />4.3 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES <br />URS provides a full range of services including preparation of CEQA and NEPA documentation and regulatory <br />permitting for various public agency and private sector clients. A representative sample of the types of reports, <br />permits, and technical studies that we've completed to date on our various on -call contracts with jurisdictions includes <br />' the following: <br />➢ CEQA Initial Studies leading to Categorical <br />➢ <br />Cultural Resources/Section 106 Studies <br />Exemptions, ND/MNDs, and EIRs <br />➢ <br />Section 4(� and 6(f) Studies <br />' <br />➢ NEPA Categorical Exclusions, <br />➢ <br />Community Impact Assessment and <br />Environmental Assessments, and <br />Relocation Impact Studies <br />1 Environmental Impact Statements <br />➢ <br />Noise and Vibration Studies <br />➢ Coastal Development Permitting <br />➢ <br />Air Quality Studies <br />1 ➢ CWA Section 401 and 404 Permitting <br />➢ <br />Traffic Studies <br />1 [California Regional Water Quality Control <br />➢ <br />Utility Impact Studies <br />Board and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, <br />➢ <br />Water Quality/Assessment Studies <br />respectively <br />➢ <br />Visual/Aesthetic Impact Assessments <br />➢ CWA and California Department of Fish and <br />➢ <br />Hazardous Materials and Wastes <br />Game Jurisdictional Determinations/Wetland <br />➢ <br />Public Outreach/Agency Scoping <br />Delineations <br />➢ <br />Farmland Conversion Impact Assessments <br />➢ California Endangered Species Act Permitting <br />➢ <br />Hydrology/Flood Plain Studies <br />i ➢ Federal Endangered Species Act Section 7 <br />➢ <br />Climate Change and Green House Gas <br />and Section 10 Consultations with the U.S. <br />Impact Assessments <br />Fish and Wildlife Service <br />➢ <br />Federal Aviation Administration / Airport <br />➢ Streambed Alteration Agreements (pursuant <br />Land Use Commission <br />to Section 1600 [et seq] of the CDFG Code) <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.