Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Analvsis: The project area is urbanized in character and there are no wildland interfaces in <br />the project vicinity. In addition, the project would not result in any increase of <br />population in the project area. Accordingly, no impact would occur. <br />VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality <br />Sources: Building Specifications; ~CGP Safety Element. <br />Would the project: <br />A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste <br />discharge requirements? <br />Finding: Less than Significant Impact. <br />Analvsis: General/Construction Note No. 23 on Sheet G-2 of the Building Specifications <br />requires the following: "Contractor shall prepare and submit for approval erosion <br />and sediment control plans prior to commencing and grading or excavation work. <br />Alf erosion and sediment control measures shall implement best management <br />practices (BMPs) in conformance with the guidelines of the California Storm <br />Water BMP Handbooks." Compliance with General/Construction Note No. 23 <br />would ensure that construction of the proposed project does not violate any <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards. With buildout of <br />the proposed project, all roadway surfaces and sidewalks would be returned to <br />their pre-construction condition, and the project would comply with all water <br />quality standards and waste discharge requirements. <br />8. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with <br />groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a <br />lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- <br />existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing -and <br />uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: The project does not propose the use of water from wells, and under existing <br />conditions the site is fully developed and covered with pavement and/or concrete. <br />Therefore, the site does not serve as a groundwater recharge zone. Significant <br />impacts would not occur. <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, Including <br />through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner, which would <br />result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact on any streams or <br />rivers. As indicated above in the discussion of Issue VIII.A, BMPs would be <br />Page 49 of 64 <br />75E-53 <br />