Laserfiche WebLink
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The EIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts due to strong seismic <br />ground shaking. No changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. <br />The development of the project will have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed <br />and mitigated in the EIR. <br />iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (No Substantial Change from Previous <br />Analysis) <br />The EIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts due to seismic-related <br />ground failure. No changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. The <br />development of the project will have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed and <br />mitigated in the EIR. <br />iv) Landslides? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The EIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts due to landslides. No <br />changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. The development of the <br />project will have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed and mitigated in the <br />EIR. <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (No Substantial Change from Previous <br />Analysis) <br />The EIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts due to soil erosion or loss of <br />topsoil. The following Mitigation Measure is from the EIR and will reduce erosion. <br />Mitigation Measure G-1 -During grading operations, the project applicant shall ensure special <br />handling of on-site soils as required by the City of Santa Ana due to the high moisture content of <br />the soils, which is well above optimum moisture conditions. The City of Santa Ana shall monitor <br />the grading contractor to ensure stabilization of the soils during grading prior to placing and <br />compacting fill soils over wet subgrade soils, as recommended in the geotechnical investigation <br />prepared by Geotechnical Professionals, Inc. <br />Implementation of mitigation measures in the EIR will reduce project impacts relating to erosion to a <br />less than significant level. Thus, development of the project will have no new or more severe impacts <br />beyond those addressed and mitigated in the EIR. <br />c) Be located on geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the <br />project and potentially result in onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br />or collapse? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The EIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts due to unstable soil. No changes <br />have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. The development of the project will <br />have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed and mitigated in the EIR. <br />d) Be located on expansive soil as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994) creating <br />substantial risks to life or property? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The EIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts relating to expansive soil. No <br />changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. The development of the <br />project will have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed and mitigated in the EIR. <br />Resolution No. 2009-025 <br />MactiRlleb®~outh <br />EIR Addendum <br />36 <br />