My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-025 - Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-02
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
2009-025 - Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:26:00 PM
Creation date
6/18/2009 12:28:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2009-025
Date
5/18/2009
Destruction Year
Perm
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject <br />property, including size, shape, topography, location or <br />surroundings, that the strict application of the zoning ordinance <br />is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not <br />otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the <br />provisions of this Chapter. <br />The MacArthur Place South site is a contained site <br />surrounded by existing commercial and residential <br />developments. The shared parking analysis, prepared <br />by Fehr & Peers has determined that sufficient parking <br />will be provided for the project during times of peak <br />demand. The parking variance will allow the applicant <br />the ability to use the property in a manner that is <br />consistent with similar surrounding commercial, <br />residential and professional uses. <br />That the granting of a variance is necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property <br />rights. <br />The granting of the variance to allow reduction in <br />parking requirement will preserve the property owner's <br />ability to develop the property with a high quality hotel <br />that is consistent with the Specific Development No. 76 <br />(SD-76) zoning district. The shared parking analysis, <br />prepared by Fehr & Peers has determined that <br />sufficient parking will be provided on site in a <br />combination of surface and structured parking during <br />times of peak demand. <br />iii. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental <br />to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of the variance to allow reduction in <br />parking requirement will not be materially detrimental to <br />the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />Conditions have been added requiring the submittal of <br />a parking management plan for the surface parking lot <br />relating to the use of tandem valet parking spaces. A <br />separate condition has been added to requiring valet <br />service on a 24-hour basis for hotel guests. <br />iv. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan of the City. <br />Resolution No. 2009-025 <br />Page 4 of 95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.