Laserfiche WebLink
It is not the City's intention to exclude very high bids or to automatically award an agreement to <br />the Proposer of the lowest price for services. The City seeks to get the best balance of service <br />value and price. <br />Based on the information provided in their RFP response, each of the Proposers will be <br />evaluated by a City selection team and will be assigned a point score for each of five evaluation <br />criteria. While evaluation is subjective by its nature, the City selection team will judge each <br />proposal on its merit in only the evaluation criteria areas. The weighted evaluation criteria <br />include: <br />Criteria Max Points <br />Qualifications that exceed the <br />minimum 20 <br />References basis is ualit 20 <br />Abilit to rovide service re uired 20 <br />Quality Control Methods and <br />Practices 20 <br />Cost 20 <br />Total 100 <br />6.3 INTERVIEW <br />An interview may be required for clarification purposes if so determined by the evaluation team. <br />However, only top rated Proposers will be asked to participate in the interview process. <br />6.4 RECOMMENDATION FOR AGREEMENT <br />The selection recommendation will be based on the accumulated point score for all criteria and <br />any clarifying interviews. Based on the evaluation of the City selection team, a recommendation <br />will be made to the City Council to authorize an agreement between the City and the selected <br />Proposer. <br />7. AWARD OF AGREEMENT <br />Based on the selection team's recommendation and upon the authorization of the City Council, <br />the City will offer the selected Vendor with an agreement to provide the service described in this <br />RFP. A sample of the draft agreement can be found in Appendix C. <br />8. ORDERING PROCEDURES <br />8.1 When a need for cabling services arises, the City will contact the Vendor and provide the <br />preliminary details of the work to be performed. <br />8.2 Services requiring a job walk <br />Page 12 of 34 <br />