Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ~ s ~ 3s ~ - <br /> k~i., Its , - r ` ~ ~ £ <br /> ~ ~ <br /> ~ p ~ <br /> .ice ` ~ '~F;i ~'1= <br /> e <br /> f kT~S { ~ , <br /> To maximize efficiency of the study process (so we won't need to go back later and redo work <br /> elements in response to feedback from the Cities), and avoid the need for more meetings than <br /> have been outlined In the RFI' we are proposing an interim data review process to obtain City <br /> feedback when each step is complete, rather #han waiting until the end of the entire task. We will <br /> submit completed data elements {land use tables, committed improvements lists, existing traffic <br /> counts and LOS, future volumes and LOS, and cost allocation table) to the Cities when each is <br /> completed, and reques# review and commen# before we apply those data in subsequent steps. <br /> Not only will this make the process more smooth and efficient, but it also will contribute to our step- <br /> by-step consensus-building process. <br /> The following section fists the activities that we have identified as part of each task component. <br /> SubtaskA.'i: Document Future Development <br /> 1. Obtain future land use information for the study area. <br /> 2. Document the land use type, quantity, location, timing, and the data source. <br /> 3. Prepare a table that lists the future development types, quantities, and phase by OCTAM TAZ. <br /> 4. Submit land use data to Cities for review/comment and concurrence. <br /> 5. Convert land use data into socioeconomic data by TAZ. <br /> 6. Calculate future development's trip generation by TAZ <br /> 7. Calculate appropria#e trip reductions for mixed-use ortransit-oriented developments. <br /> 8. Summarize future trip generation by OCTAM TAZ for each of two scenarios: 2019 and 2035. <br /> ~ Subtask A.2: Document Commf#ted Roadway Improvements <br /> 1. Obtain in#ormation about committed roadway improvements. <br /> 2. Document committed roadway improvements, projected year of completion, and funding <br /> information. <br /> 3. Submit committed improvements information to Cities for review/comment and concurrence. <br /> Subtask A.3: Document Existing Traffic Conditions and Prepare Future Traffic <br /> Forecasts <br /> Up to 60 roadway segments and/or intersections wil? be.$elected in consul#ation with Cities' staff as <br /> locations that maybe candidates for enhancements due to future development. These will be the <br /> "study locations" for all scenarios. <br /> ~ 1. Obtain available recent traffic counts {at midblock and intersection study locations) from the <br /> Cities. <br /> ~ 2. Conduct new traffic counts at study locations for which recent counts are not available. <br /> ~ For budgeting purposes, we have assumed up to 25 midblock locations (24 hours) and 15 <br /> intersections (AM and PM peak turning movements} wilt be counted. <br /> ~ 3. Calculate existing peak levels of service {LOS), in accordance with the Cities' LOS guidelines. <br /> ~ 4. Submit existing count volumes and LOS results to Cities for review/comment and concurrence. <br /> <br /> ~ 9lnnorss.ov <br /> Kfmley-Nom <br /> ~ and Associates, Inc. <br /> 25C-19 <br /> <br />