PBS&J 3a - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

9. Receipt of City comments by PBS&J on AFEIR....................................................... April 12, 2010 10. Submittal of FEIR to City.............................................................................................. April 19, 2010 11. Planning Commission Meeting...................................................................................... April 26, 2010 12. City Council Meeting.........................................................................................................May 17, 2010 The schedule below includes the following assumptions: ■ Receipt of a complete and firm draft Project Description at kickoff ■ Stable project description throughout the EIR process ■ No substantial changes to the traffic report (including trip generation or additional intersections after the completion of the draft report) or other technical reports are required SECTION 4 Fee Proposal PBS&J has prepared a cost estimate that is competitive, yet accurately reflective of the level of effort required to complete the scope of services and schedule requested by the City. For your convenience, we have provided a detailed cost proposal, identifying labor costs by task, by person, and by hour. We have also detailed our direct costs. If the City decides to reproduce various documents, the direct costs associated with reproduction can be reduced. h. Cost Assumptions The estimated cost and schedule are based on the work program outlined in the scope of work and key issues, and the following assumptions. PBS&J will draw from technical studies prepared for the project site to the greatest extent possible. Should additional research be deemed necessary beyond that identified in this scope of work, PBS&J will conduct such research upon specific direction and authorization by the City. PBS&J would propose to renegotiate the budget to include this additional work. PBS&J will analyze a no -project alternative (consisting of both the no project/no development alternative and the no project/reasonably foreseeable use alternative per Section 15126 of the 2000 CEQA Guidelines), a reduced size alternative, and another alternative that will be defined at a later date. PBS&J will attend up to: ■ Four public meetings, including, but not limited to, the Draft EIR public hearing, one Planning Commission, and one City Council meeting. ■ Twelve (12) project meetings with City staff. Additional public or project meetings PBS&J is requested to attend will be charged on a time -and - materials basis. PBS&J has assumed the following specific number of copies of various documents to be printed including: