Laserfiche WebLink
1 117. There is a very finite set of CITY employees who worked on October 23, 2021 during the <br /> 2 <br /> relevant time period and their movements are recorded-by the CAD system and by the GPS on their police <br /> 3 <br /> 4 units -when using their key card to enter the police department. <br /> 5 118. Almost immediately MENDENDEZ learned that two CITY sergeants were in the sergeant <br /> 6 office and witnessed specific MET officers go down to the first floor(i.e., near the roll call room) during <br /> 7 <br /> the relevant time frame and then, soon thereafter, return laughing to their offices on the third floor. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 119. Although MENENDEZ told investigator Sergeant Javier Aceves the names of both sergeant <br /> 10 witnesses, MENENDEZ is informed and believes that they (and other relevant witnesses) were never <br /> 11 interviewed. <br /> 12 <br /> 120. Indeed, MENENDEZ's interview was purposefully delayed until one month after Officer <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Rodriguez retired(i.e., MENENDEZ was not interviewed until December of 2021) - after which he heard <br /> 15 nothing further for approximately 15 months -allowing Officer Rodriguez to obtain his above-referenced <br /> 16 November 2021 post-CITY employment at the Orange County Sheriff's Department. <br /> 17 <br /> U. Throughout October and November of 2021, MENENDEZ Continued to <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Complain and CITY Continued to Essentially Ignore Same. <br /> 20 121. On October 27,2021, a POA general membership meeting was held at which time the Vote <br /> 21 of No Confidence was discussed <br /> 22 <br /> 122. At this meeting,MENENDEZ made several comments supporting the Vote and pointed out <br /> 23 <br /> 24 false information provided by Commander Lizardi, Commander Hernandez and others known to be in the <br /> 25 Valentin "camp/gang". <br /> 26 123. At this time Valentin supporter Sergeant Richard Shin (who ran against and was defeated <br /> 27 <br /> by POA President Serrano for the POA President position) made his displeasure regarding MENENDEZ <br /> 28 <br /> known. <br /> 20 <br /> MENENDEZ V. CITY OF SANTA ANA CASENO. <br /> COMPLAINT <br />