AECOM 1 - 2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

® AECOM 17 Schedule AECOM has developed the schedule shown in Figure 9 based upon past experience on similar projects. We have demonstrated our ability to deliver planning documents on grade separations, from Feasibility Studies and PSRE's to full Project Report/Environmental Documents. Within the last 12 months, AECOM has worked on the following grade separation planning documents: • Raymond Avenue • Orangethorpe Avenue • Baldwin Park Avenue • Puente Avenue • Jurupa Avenue • McKinley Street • Streeter Avenue Our experience also helps us understand the critical elements which need to be address to ensure the project schedule is met, and these include: Third Party Coordination — Actively engagingthird parties, from the railroads to the utility companies, from day one of the project is essential. Maintaining the open line of communication and flow of information is crucial to timely responses, direction and approval. Early agreement on design parameters, such as vertical clearances for the railroad, as well as relocation alternatives for utilities, will help pave the path for approvals. Environmental — Engagingthe environmental planners during the initial alignment studies will be critical to ensuring that the all components are adequately covered in the PES or PEAR, which will facilitate approvals through the City for CEQA and Caltrans for NEPA. Response Procedures — AECOM takes a very proactive stance in addressing issues and comments as they arise. This eliminates need for rehashing of previous issues or multi -cycle reviews and responses at each submittal milestone. There are several components in achieving this: 1. Develop and action list, each uniquely numbered, to track them from inception to closure. 2. Conduct workshop meetings with stakeholders prior to submittals to review the product and receive feedback. 3. Develop a comment response matrix to track comments through to closeout. AECOM is confident that in our approach to this project, along with our relationships with the City, SCRRA, OCTA, Caltrans, and the utility companies, we will meet the schedule as shown. ID Task Name Duration M-1 IMI I M2 I M3 I M4 IM5 M6 M7 M8 1 NTP -- - -- - -- 0 days 2 Phase 1- PSR and PES or PEAR MR - 175 days 3 -- Project Management/Coordination 170 days 4 Project Study Report 175 days 5 Research 8 Data Collection -- --- ------ — 5 days ---- 6 Ob-tain ROE from SCRRA 30 days 7 _ Prepare/Obtain Approval Traffic Control Plan --- 15 days 8 -----...--- --- _— Utility Identification 50 days 9 Topo/Base/Field Work/Design Surveys 20 days 10 Prepare Alternatives Concepts (3 Min.) 50 days 11 Prepare Traffic Analysis and TMP for Alts. 30 days 12 Geotechnical Recommendations - 30 days i 13 — Structural APS's — 30 days 14 Hydraulics and Hydrology Study 30 days } 15 Right -of -Way Identification 10 days j 16 Cost Estimates 20 days 17 Structural Type Selection 20 days 18 Conceptual Engineering Plans for Alts. 20 days 19 Draft Project Study Report Equivalent 30 days 20 Submit Draft PSRE to City - ---- 0 days ; 21 City Review Draft PSRE 15 days 22 Final PSRE 10 days 23 City Review/Approve Final PSRE 15 days 24 — Environmental PES or PEAR 40 days S 25 Environmental PES or PEAR 40 days - Figure 9 - Proposed Schedule i Proposal for Project Study Report Equivalent and Conceptual Engineering P!arS for Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project