My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2011
>
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 4:16:00 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 2:08:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2011-023
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br />Table 2-1 CEQA Findings <br />Level of <br />Significance after <br />Impact Statement Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings Mitigation Measures Findings Mitigation <br />development of the Transit Zoning Code to <br />fund all identified mitigation measures. <br />The program should monitor phasing <br />development of the Transit Zoning Code and <br />defer or eliminate improvements if the <br />densities permitted in the Transit Zoning <br />Code are not occurring. <br />Program phasing should be monitored <br />through preparation of specific project traffic <br />impact studies for any project that is expected <br />to include more than 100 dwelling units or <br />100,000 sf of non-residential development. <br />Traffic impact studies should use traffic <br />generation rates that are deemed to be most <br />appropriate for the actual development <br />proposed. <br />Properties within Santa Ana and within one- <br />half mile of the Transit Zoning Code that <br />redevelop to result in higher traffic generation <br />should also participate in the program to <br />insure equity. <br />The City may elect to implement appropriate <br />mitigation measures as a condition of <br />approval of the proposed developments, <br />where appropriate. All or part of the costs of <br />these improvements may be considered to be <br />a negotiated credit toward the program, <br />however the program must be administered in <br />a manner that assures that it can fund <br />necessary improvements to maintain <br />adequate level of service at all intersections <br />within this study. If funding of priority <br />improvements cannot be assured, credit for <br />construction of lower priority improvements <br />may not be assured or may be postponed <br />2-42 Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.