My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25H - AGMT - STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
07/16/2012
>
25H - AGMT - STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2012 5:31:47 PM
Creation date
7/12/2012 5:31:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25H
Date
7/16/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agreement Award for Street Sweeping Services <br />July 16, 2012 <br />2of6 <br />Procurement Process for Contract Sweeping: <br />Staff advertised and released a Request for Proposals (RFP) on November 21, 2011 and <br />requested quotes for four sweeping scenarios that included different levels of sweeping service. <br />Requirements of the RFP included: continuous staffing provisions for sweeping routes when <br />contract staff is on leave; alternative-fuel sweepers and relief sweepers; GPS tracking software; <br />400 miles of special sweeping at no additional cost for parades, special events, and roadway <br />hazards; soliciting employment opportunities from Santa Ana residents; and participation in <br />community events. Additionally, the RFP required contractors to extend offers of employment to <br />any displaced City street-sweeper equipment operators for a minimum of one year at their last <br />base salary amount. Furthermore, the City would have the ability to add or delete services <br />without City employee and equipment impacts. <br />Staff held a pre-proposal meeting on December 1, 2011 and 11 sweeping contractors attended. <br />Submittals were due on January 4, 2012 and the City received proposals from four sweeping <br />contractors. The proposals were evaluated by a team comprised of two representatives of the <br />Public Works Agency and one from another City utilizing the following criteria: phasing <br />approach; equipment, employee training program, ability to meet performance on schedule, <br />company experience and reputation, and competiveness of the fees. In addition, staff <br />performed reference checks on all of the proposers and determined that all were highly <br />qualified. All four contractors were invited to the interview phase of the evaluation process. <br />The maximum obtainable rating score for each of the four proposers was 330. The ratings and <br />costs for the four contractors are identified in Table 1: <br />TABLE 1 <br /> TOTAL <br /> <br />RANK <br />PROPOSER <br />LOCATION <br />RATING <br />PERCENTAGE PROPOSALFEE <br /> SCORE (CURB MILE) <br />1 Athens Services City of Industry 304 92.1 $850,790 <br /> $16.00 <br />2 Clean Street Gardena 288 87.3 $1,250,300 <br /> $23.42 <br />3 Venco Power Oxnard 267 80 <br />9 $983,370 <br /> Sweeping Inc. . ($18.42) <br />4 *R.F. Dickson Co. Inc. Downey 216 65.5 $1,187,304 <br /> $22.24 <br />*R.F. Dickson Co. Inc. submitted an alternative proposal which did not include the hiring of the displaced City <br />employees, however, it did comply with the balance of the RFP requirements. <br />25H-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.