Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Vince C. Fregoso <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />demolished, including the residence and orchard, which will affect the property's eligibility and <br />listing. As a result, the project will be examined and analyzed to see if it could follow the Secretary <br />of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation to determine if impacts can be brought to a level of less than <br />significant. Mitigation measures may be developed to lessen the project's impacts; however, there <br />may still be a significant impact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations would have to be <br />prepared as part of the CEQA assessment. Additionally, since ibis likely there will be significant <br />public and agency comments regarding the proposed impacts from this project to a locally listed <br />historic resource, our efforts associated with this analysis will be increased to substantiate the <br />findings and to minimize possible CEQA challenges to the document. <br />Analysis of the new Hybrid Alternative will also be -incorporated into ,the environmental document <br />and will consider whether the Sexlingcr property would retain its eligibility for listing to the City of <br />Santa Ana's Register of Historic Properties, as well as whether the`.:project would impact the <br />historical resource. Future uses of the residence and the orchard areas' will be considered to <br />determine if a change in use could cause a significant impact.. Further, since the orchard is an <br />important part of the property, the removal, relocation, or development near the trees could impact its <br />significance. <br />Assumptions: <br />1. URS will provide an °electronic copy of the Revised Draft EIR for the City staff review and <br />comment. <br />2. URS will address and incorporate one (1) round of comprehensive department-coordinated <br />comments provided by the City on the Revised Draft EIR. <br />3. URS assumes no changes Nvill be made to the.original project description or to any portions <br />of the Revised Draft EIRnot related tothe additional alternative. <br />TASK 04 - NOTICING AND RE-CIRCULATION OF DRAFT EIR <br />URS will prepare a Notice of Availability;(NOA) for the revised Draft EIR. The NOA will be <br />mailed by URS via regular trail to those identified on the Distribution List, as previously provided by <br />the City. <br />URS will coordinate the reproduction of hard copies of the Draft EIR document. URS will provide <br />to the Cita? 25 hard copies of the Draft FIR and 25 CDs with Appendix B: Technical Studies. URS <br />will also provide 10 CDs with the PDF version of the Draft EIR. <br />URS will coordinate with the State of California, Office of Planning and Research, State <br />Clearinghouse and prepare 15 Executive Summaries, 15 CDs of the EIR document, and copy of the <br />NOA. URS will submit the package to the State Clearinghouse via overnight delivery. <br />Assumptions: <br />1. URS will provide the City an electronic copy of the NOA for review. <br />25A-8